• The Absolute Truth – Essay

    There is a concept of absolute truth, but a man as the self would find absolute truth is not really obtainable through the contents of just thought alone by us humanity but passed down from what has proven its existence of the truths. If so that were to happen, there would be a truth of all truth but the reasoning behind much of what to use truth for would be skewed to that of thinking we always have to go after every truth in order to find it. For this reasoning there is a belief contrary to its source and people know that some individual to something unknown once had a thought. I will not argue the case of disproving Gods now or the fact of what is a main deity now, to power or the truth, meaning I will accept some and not all, or agree to disagree and opposite, but it is to leave that sad statement there that people would rather disprove the truth or not to believe what actually sometimes happens, or it could have happened that one source of thought gave us a truth to the point people would forget individually or in time, and others by choice over a period of time they hide it to where they actually knew it to that of had an option to choose what to believe and then make up a situation order that did not apply in context or accuracy, to define that something did at not one point exist to a realism of common individuals or that being the dignity of what may be alive in the hearts to that of memory.

    A fallacy is that every truth if so found a lie or vice to partial is not to always be known or acted towards mankind as we live the future generation compared to that of an ancient world and as the time periods of descendants, kids to that of their elder counterpart or growing ego. The matter or argument case does one believe in this or it does not suggest the appropriate answer for that or the chain of certain statement or questions which will define the outcome of an answer as much of the concepts of a man without the knowledge thereof and is not known unless if so proven or accepted from more than clarity to reasoning alone hopefully validly acted unless otherwise confirmed not so or a false attribute is added to the purpose of the statement made. Not every reasoning that contributed is relative or proper description of or to the truth or fact perception being stated.

    Therefor each factor or fragment must be looked over carefully with mental or emotional mindset to the point others need to be clear in what they say sometimes during a translation of much information given hand to hand or other witnesses to admit from true site or more than one witness. This is not to twist the man or prove someone is deeply a liar or by saying ones truth is not factual compared to one in written or stated form. Both could be correct if so proven they argued similar thought and it was found factual for same or different reason towards respectfully the same purpose or desire to search for, even if an observation was vague from viewpoints towards the objectivity to subject in perspective. A man has their truth and their falseness, not saying a perception is always false, meaning that also which could be true, but the answer is found within a series of contradiction to can a statement have a standard for a basis or at least a foundation point, or reference.

    A man willingly could know absolute truth to that of perspectives which does not make a man wrong to explain unless each one is a falsehood purposely with the intention thereof, or for perhaps to keep something from being known in order to protect or to gain from situation, though it is wrong to lie toward the truth if so knowingly that whosoever it was taken from or the remains there of if it is passed down through someone else for a lesson to be learned or remembered found out to be realistic compared to the aspect also that the truth is not to hurt but hopefully to heal or teach important living techniques, to solve problems, though it cannot but ease a certain amount of pain or us to learn a lesson from trials if so one suffers a living reality check. Our denial or non-acceptance leads to what we would not want to hear rather than giving an explanation and it being deemed acceptable to both sides.

    The one truth if so to be proven above the validity of a man or us each to not realize it if so factual is above every man including oneself of our thoughts as some of us spoke with another personality though unsure how we acted to how deep the thoughts may go to the attitudes contrary to that of both beast and human or holy compared to wicked. A man or many more forgot who they once were as some refuse to go back for variety of reasons, but it is we must acknowledge our regrets to move forward.

    Truth is a manifested expression and therefore the situation is not taken lightly as to say truth is always from the truthful to that of liars never tell the truth. If those who were once good became wicked to shallow or reverted, you know the concerns of the heart of a man and many more as the consciousness of self. Truth does not change but is added or taken away from based on much interpretation does take form. But the fact something happened once did not change the cause or the issue which went through a situation rather than the effect to result it has on a universal perception to the action of the deepest source of thought, which is incomprehensible us to know how the mind manifest the reality of everything to what power did one have or so much more to understand life and knowledge. Others like me should not suppress or of this boast say that we know it all. And we should consider the source of all truth which is absolute truth valid, not common to the certainty of each of us a mankind. For that reason absolute truth is divine of quality to the core intention meant from its maker and relevance that is of matter. Truth attributes to reality perception changes.

    Life pride to knowledge was no answer for me strangely as the world knows more than I do because I am one man and I admit I am not the maker of a world and people are as I a little strict with what we believe in at times by practice rather than speaking with compassion, me not wishing to impose or change an individual. They as I said must realize the truth for themselves. I shall ask them and tell them this, also I, to at least go to something and back up what one states if so found contradicted in words.

    Admitting this, who knew life and knowledge but lived to tell it? The man or person, perhaps smaller child with the faith if so tolerable in manner by many, hopefully did not get lost on their path to whatever so is that thing called absolute truth and spirit higher than self; or that history to answer was not hidden from those who needed to be reassured by the providence of that truth to understand what each one seeks after. That desire, it helped me cope with much even mental persecution with doubts and my memory I could recall to the point of where one forgot as keywords strike the mind and memory grows deep; for it above both is everlasting and so though I imperfect as others some more better at their way, though acknowledging, I respect this of that source in both life even logical for knowledge; and not believing to a point having to prove it if so each one realizes something greater or higher than them as I or those before and after. I said before I will not argue deism or theology but some may differ.

    Every man deems this as once a living being or form, one true God, though I will not discuss the falseness or argument. It is of an acknowledgement as this though I am not worthy to see unless blind and awakened, or refined as if keywords strike the mind. I must or should find out that source or motivation which passes this thought to me as it did, or much words of realistic and respectable principle with such help other people reconcile to it. If so inspired and found these words true of what I say though still younger, the source mentioned in reference that also which sustains balance among principalities and much council to insight manner, it is and of GOD.