|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:18 pm
|
|
|
|
The trickster, knave, prankster, rascal and rogue invoke strong reactions in the people I know.
They are Living and Undying Sacrifice, The Bane of the Respectable, The Quintessence of Humor, Masters of Illusion and Delusion and the Advocate of your Uncertanity.
Loki, Coyote, Eris, Satan, Anansi, Veles and Eshu to name but a few- and they have been the fire caressing the crucible of mankind since their inception.
Let us eat doughnuts and question the questioner for a while.
Disclaimer: It doesn’t take much more than one or two conversations with me to realize I am a hard polytheist. I am in no way, shape or form suggesting that these beings are anything other than unique individuals who fill a role in their community and/or culture.
Remember the platypus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:19 pm
|
|
|
|
The Bane of the Respectable
The Trickster is often the bane of the “Respectable”. I propose there are the following reasons for this:
Trickster actions are seen as idle and thus an anathema to those who work hard. In a culture that has a strong work ethic and a focus on labor for the good of the community, the Idle are seen as dead weight. This is very much the case in agricultural societies.
This I find ironic, because at the heart of what allows for a culture to develop is “leisure time”, or so my anthropology teacher said. After all, if you only have time for survival, the hallmarks of a culture such as art, theology and philosophy will not have a chance to develop.
This holds true for humor and waste as well.
Moderate waste, I would argue, is the sign of a healthy culture. If a community can allow for waste, one has enough for it’s people. Thus, the Trickster is birthed at the dawn of culture and the dichotomy of Hard Work and Idle Humor can be seen in many culture’s mythology.
Even more interesting is that The Trickster as the Harbinger of Culture often Births Transcendental Thought through questioning, challenging and humor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:20 pm
|
|
|
|
How and When to Fall Flat on Your Arse
The “problem” with being “Respectable”, is that it lays a foundation for stagnation. Static existence is not contusive to growth- personal or cultural.
Traditions are important to a culture- but when they hinder the community they once benefited, they need to be questioned.
Within the Respectable and Idle Humor dichotomy, there is a need to find out what is still useful and what isn’t. Thus, the Guard of Tradition meets the Challenger of Humor and they contest one another. However, the static nature of Tradition provides comfort in an uncertain world. This leads to an unwillingness to let the useless fall away. Our culture has created the idiom of “Better the devil we know”. We often see this in destructive long term relationships as well- the person who would leave stays because there is psychological comfort in what is known, even if it is unpleasant.
When this stagnation becomes repressive, the Trickster comes along to break up the static patterns.
However, too often in real life, there seems to be an assumption that said Trickster will put things back together again.
While I do see reparations in mythology, they are often done for things that did not need to be broken apart. In situations where there is need, I find mythology supports the people who needed the challenge are called to pick up the mess. Mind you, this paragraph is merely UPG.
And speaking of UPG:
My own UPG says that laughter is a wonderful tool for breaking up static patterns. The vibration of a good laugh can be felt through the whole body and it stretches muscles that one might otherwise be unaware of. There is an ecstasy present in both laughter and suffering that seems to be at the core of what it is to be in corporeal reality. (I’d argue that it is that core ecstasy is what those who seek ascension need to give up- not their cloaks, but that’s another thread.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:21 pm
|
|
|
|
The Living Sacrifice
Ever heard the saying “If ya kill ‘em, they don’t learn nothin’!”
This is perhaps best illustrated in the Trickster. It would appear that even the Tricksters that die are usually resurrected.
They risk and sacrifice themselves, often in the form of their “egos”, time and again for the betterment of their people.
One of the best examples of this is Loki and the Treasures of the gods. Through the risking of his own head, the Aesir and Vanir received lovely treasures, treasures that without them, the Aesir would be unable to leave Asgurd- without this, the protection and knowledge from the gods might not have reached their people.
I cannot begin to count how many times Coyote has been flayed alive and in the processed, gained insight, wisdom or treasures.
While these Tricksters may initially cause harm to their people (cutting Sif’s hair, theft of the river, etc), the reparations are often much better than the original loss, and thus a small slight- an error that we as humans can relate to, is a catalyst to better the community.
This error also fosters forgiveness amongst the Trickster's People, for if a Spirit like the Trickster can error and show mortals their folly, it is perhaps easier to except error in others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:54 pm
|
|
|
|
I'd love to have a doughnut, but I'm not at my finest, cognitively, right now, so I'm not gonna try and get too deep on this.
I did a lot of growing up in New Mexico, and so I did a lot of growing up with Coyote stories. I always adored them. I liked how vulgar and brash Coyote is. I always liked how they weren't all moral tales, necessarily, or great tidbits of wisdom, but still had something to say (I'm still trying to decipher all the implications of "Coyote and Teeth in the Wrong Places").
I guess what I'm most curious about is how Coyote, as a figure, gets treated as such a prolific folkloric character. Like why the Looney Tunes Coyote is no longer really a trickster, but a plotting semi-villain who always gets outwitted by a character much more tricky than himself and learns nothing from the encounters (and why the "Roadrunner" looks like some kind of ostrich, but that's another tangent).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|