|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:40 pm
Well, I made a thread for David Clement-Davies, and there's a Warriors one, so why not a Watership Down thread?
I like this book more than any other book with animals as characters that I've read. Ever. Don't know why. But I really do like the fact that he mixes in just enough human and animal traits to make al his characters seem believable as rabbits. Even David Clement-Davies doesn't do it so well, and his books come in a close second for this branch of fantasy, in my opinion. Tales of Watership Down was good, but I prefer the original. Although Bluebell's little nonsense story in Tales make me laugh so much. Although the only thing I still remember from it are the green and sky-blue horses, and riding them with the girl from the farm, Lucy.
Anyway. Opinions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:39 pm
Oh, hey, thanks for making this thread. Sorry to get all down on the Warrior's thread.
Interestingly enough, I once had to read Watership Down and compare it with Lord of the Flies for a sociology course. I like the way that Watership Down actually explores different social structures, which resemble human ones, using rabbits as the main players. Now, I don't actually know much about rabbit behavior, but I can recognize patterns of human behavior from time to time and this book was often spot-on.
You know, it's interesting to note that Adams, like Tolkien, has a rich parallel world developed in this book, even going so far as to invent a rabit language (I still call cars Hrudhudhus sometimes) and even a kind of vernacular ("going tharn," silflay, etc.) Yet he's also carefully interwoven the instinctual and observed behavior of real lapines into this fantasy world of talking bunnies. I think it's a great example of what the imagination can do with a little push from the real world.
Adams has written quite a few books, but I'm afraid Watership Down is the only thing I've read by him. Certainly I didn't get around to reading Tales from Watership Down and I wonder why.
I haven't read Plague Dogs, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:27 pm
heart Ah Watership Down!! I love that book. Its been a long time since I read it though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:16 pm
I've only read Watership Down and Tales from Watership Down. By the time I looked at his other books, I wasn't so into reading new books that had animals as characters, even if it was by an author I already knew.
I love the rabbit language! It was so interesting. I can't remember the term for it....
I always half-forget most of the side characters until one of them is mentioned. Acorn, for example. After they leave the evil, man-controlled warren, I entirely forgot about him until Tales or something. A couple of the other original rabbits I always forget about, too. I forget them so thouroughly, in fact that I can't remember their names right now. Let's see.... The original rabbits. Fiver, Hazel, Bigwig, Silver, Dandelion, Blackberry, Acorn, something with the word hawk in it, I think, and that's all I remember. There had to have been more. Oh, well. I like Blackberry and Bigwig best. Two complete opposites, but they're fun. And Dandelion is another favorite. Gotta love the storytellers.
Tales from Watership Down is a good book. Not as good as Watership Down, but you get quite a bit of interesting, random tales from various characters. As I said, Bluebell's nonsense story is really funny. If you get around to it, at least read that chapter. I think it was chapter eleven, but I'm not entirely sure. That may have just been the last number on the page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:58 am
Watership down was my first "big" novel that I ever read on my own, I read it at least once a year every year from when I was 9 up until a year or so ago when my book (which was old to begin with) finally fell apart beyond repair.
I also love Tales From Watershipdown, but the first book will always be one of my most beloved reads, I really need to start coming through used book-stores too find myself a new copy of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:05 am
It's a great book! 'Specially someone who loves animals. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:03 pm
I haven't read the book, but I've seen the cartoon version of it, and it was disgusting. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:08 pm
lavenvi05 I haven't read the book, but I've seen the cartoon version of it, and it was disgusting. xp The animated movie was awful. I saw it and I was pissed off for a week. I was so thankful that I'd only rented it from the library. I would never pay to see that movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:11 pm
Verene Watership down was my first "big" novel that I ever read on my own, I read it at least once a year every year from when I was 9 up until a year or so ago when my book (which was old to begin with) finally fell apart beyond repair. lol. Watership Down was my favorite book for the longest time. I just kept rereading it. It's now more tape than book I think. I would never throw it away though, it would make me sad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:43 am
loved the book heart i think it's really enchanting but i haven't read Tales or seen the movie(which by the sounds of it is a good thing) mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:09 am
lavenvi05 I haven't read the book, but I've seen the cartoon version of it, and it was disgusting. xp The cartoon version movie of it is HORRIBLE! I was excited when I heard ther was a movie of it, then I started the movie, and I honestly couldn't finish it. The book is SO much better, they can't even be compared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:35 pm
Verene lavenvi05 I haven't read the book, but I've seen the cartoon version of it, and it was disgusting. xp The cartoon version movie of it is HORRIBLE! I was excited when I heard ther was a movie of it, then I started the movie, and I honestly couldn't finish it. The book is SO much better, they can't even be compared. I actually finished the movie. I just wanted to see what other characters they left out. I can't believe they skipped over Strawberry! I love Strawberry! If I remember rightly, didn't they not have Holly or Bluebell either? And Hyzenthlay went on the run with the dog, too. Ugh. No does went on the run. What I really hated was the addition of the doe in the beginning, who got taken by the hawk. For one thing, they didn't lose a single member of the original party. For another, no does at all left with them. Why did they add a non-existent character?! Grr! <.< I'll stop now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:30 pm
I love watership down! Ive read it i think 5x? Its such an amazing book!
The movie was a poor make of it.They left out many characters,important ones too.The book is 100x better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:41 pm
Oh my god. Not only was there a movie, but there's apparently a TV series for the book. Also animated. That's just scary.
...To find it to watch it, or not? Probably not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:57 am
A T.V series!? Thats just insane! I dont know about you,but i couldnt watch it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|