|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:20 pm
A malefic deck still uses blue eyes effectively.
Monster:13(sin=malefic)
2x sin cyber end dragon
3x sin stardust dragon
1x sin blue-eyes white dragon
3x sin parallel gear
1x dark armed dragon
1x sangan
1x zombie carrier
1x spirit reaper
Spells:15
3x sin world
2x terra forming
1x trunade
3x pot of duality
1x allure of darkness
2x cyclone
1x book of moon
1x dark hole
1x monster reborn
Traps:12
2x bottomless trap hole
1x deck devastation virus
3x sin claw stream
2x solemn warning
1x solemn judgement
1x torrential tribute
1x trap dustshoot
1x mirror force
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:08 pm
rolleyes This should be in the deck database.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 6:05 pm
claru gardeford A malefic deck still uses blue eyes effectively. Monster:13(sin=malefic) 2x sin cyber end dragon 3x sin stardust dragon 1x sin blue-eyes white dragon 3x sin parallel gear 1x dark armed dragon 1x sangan 1x zombie carrier 1x spirit reaper Spells:15 3x sin world 2x terra forming 1x trunade 3x pot of duality 1x allure of darkness 2x cyclone 1x book of moon 1x dark hole 1x monster reborn Traps:12 2x bottomless trap hole 1x deck devastation virus 3x sin claw stream 2x solemn warning 1x solemn judgement 1x torrential tribute 1x trap dustshoot 1x mirror force I see no Blue eyes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 6:21 pm
TwinHeart claru gardeford A malefic deck still uses blue eyes effectively. Monster:13(sin=malefic) 2x sin cyber end dragon 3x sin stardust dragon 1x sin blue-eyes white dragon 3x sin parallel gear 1x dark armed dragon 1x sangan 1x zombie carrier 1x spirit reaper Spells:15 3x sin world 2x terra forming 1x trunade 3x pot of duality 1x allure of darkness 2x cyclone 1x book of moon 1x dark hole 1x monster reborn Traps:12 2x bottomless trap hole 1x deck devastation virus 3x sin claw stream 2x solemn warning 1x solemn judgement 1x torrential tribute 1x trap dustshoot 1x mirror force I see no Blue eyes! That's what makes it so perfect wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 9:25 pm
... first off, Malefic Blue Eyes is not Blue Eyes. Second, you use one in a bad deck. Not effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 4:51 pm
I don't use this deck. it's a friend of mines, so i could care less how good it is.
for every malefic monster in the deck theres a real card counterpart for they're effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 6:05 pm
claru gardeford I don't use this deck. it's a friend of mines, so i could care less how good it is. for every malefic monster in the deck theres a real card counterpart for they're effects. Uh where's the blue-eyes? I don't see how he can bring out the malific version ( which is still a awful card) if he doesn't have a blue eyes in the deck to begin with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:12 pm
TwinHeart claru gardeford I don't use this deck. it's a friend of mines, so i could care less how good it is. for every malefic monster in the deck theres a real card counterpart for they're effects. Uh where's the blue-eyes? I don't see how he can bring out the malific version ( which is still a awful card) if he doesn't have a blue eyes in the deck to begin with. Not to mention he was trying to say it was effective though he just said he doesn't care how bad it is. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 6:39 am
Gravitational Molestation TwinHeart claru gardeford I don't use this deck. it's a friend of mines, so i could care less how good it is. for every malefic monster in the deck theres a real card counterpart for they're effects. Uh where's the blue-eyes? I don't see how he can bring out the malific version ( which is still a awful card) if he doesn't have a blue eyes in the deck to begin with. Not to mention he was trying to say it was effective though he just said he doesn't care how bad it is. neutral your point makes much more sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 3:47 pm
TwinHeart claru gardeford I don't use this deck. it's a friend of mines, so i could care less how good it is. for every malefic monster in the deck theres a real card counterpart for they're effects.Uh where's the blue-eyes? I don't see how he can bring out the malific version ( which is still a awful card) if he doesn't have a blue eyes in the deck to begin with. did you read the bolded part? it's not that hard to see... it means for every malefic blue eyes theres a normal blue eyes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Molestation
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:15 pm
Dude, we're saying Blue Eyes White Dragon is not listed in your original post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 7:29 am
it don t here to be in there neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:28 pm
naruto x demon it don t here to be in there neutral English, do you speak it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:32 am
well according to him, for every sin theres a normal part so we are supposed to assume he has them, but for the record that means this deck has way more cards than needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
