|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:56 pm
M
3X hunter owl 3X flying kamikiri #1 3X wind effigy 3X silpheed 2X simorgh, bird of ancestry 2X swift birdman joe 2X mist valley soldier 2X lady ninja yae
S
2X swallow's nest 2X rising air current 2X pot of avarice 1X giant trunade 1X monster reborn 1X dark hole 1X cold wave
T
3X icarus attack 3X compulsory evacuation device 2X seven tools of the bandit 1X mirror force 1X solemn judgment
Synch
3X stardust dragon
yes i know i only have one synchro in there. its more of a fun deck but just saying yes i know their should be more than just stardust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:23 pm
one thing, why dark hole i feel like there are so many other cards that could be used there
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:30 pm
it's a good card in any deck and i was having trouble as it was thinking of s/t to put in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:52 pm
for what its worth. i tested this deck twice on duel monsters genesis and it won both times in just a couple of turns. I'm going to have to test it more though because the opponents decks weren't all that great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:01 pm
Raiza the storm monarch?
Dragunity would be a fun topic to throw in...possibly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:30 am
raiza is always a possibility. only reason i didnt choose him was because he doesnt return enough for my liking in this deck. the dragunity eh i just do wanna mix in but thats more of a preference than a strategic thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:37 am
lol oh and i finally got in a few more duels on DMG and it won all of those as well which makes me happy and it had a big reversal against some deck that annoyed the crap out of me with a combo of kaiser collesium and cyber blader. but i managed to win by getting out lady ninja yae out by herself returning all s/t then monster reborning my dead stardust and summoning silpheed. after that the person was at like 500lp left. they were cocky and reset their facedowns and he attacked directly with cyber tutu. i top decked swift birdman joe and discarded him for yae's effect for the win. it's annoying that that was the best deck i faced with this so the testing continues until someone beats it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:45 am
i actually like this deck ._.; (in a non-competitive way) maybe side Raiza?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:48 am
I'd probably do that but i don't build side decks usually. i know that sounds stupid but they just annoy me. lol and what you talkn bout not competitive lols. but yeah really itd be better if i could find good draw power for it so it could go quicker. though it can finish a duel in just a few turns if im not getting stopped every five seconds of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:05 am
shrab I'd probably do that but i don't build side decks usually. i know that sounds stupid but they just annoy me. lol and what you talkn bout not competitive lols. but yeah really itd be better if i could find good draw power for it so it could go quicker. though it can finish a duel in just a few turns if im not getting stopped every five seconds of it. haha prove me wrong actually i would like it if this deck won a tournament against tier 1 decks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:07 am
Tsukinoki shrab I'd probably do that but i don't build side decks usually. i know that sounds stupid but they just annoy me. lol and what you talkn bout not competitive lols. but yeah really itd be better if i could find good draw power for it so it could go quicker. though it can finish a duel in just a few turns if im not getting stopped every five seconds of it. haha prove me wrong actually i would like it if this deck won a tournament against tier 1 decks i'd love that too but i seriously doubt it. the only deck i have thatd come close to doing that is my machina. but yeah imma work on this and see how well i can get it to work in the long run because i see potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|