|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:00 pm
Okay, here's a challenge if you wanna participate as well. Build a deck with 60 cards in it and build it as well as humanly possible, post it in a new thread, and see what happens. Just to see if it can stack up with a 40 Card deck.
Inb4 tired arguments about decks higher than 40 run slower and more sluggishly. I've heard it all before, but its not stopped TCGs like Magic from running 60.
Deck: 60
Monsters: 31
Abyssal Kingshark x3
Deep Sea Diva x3
Deepsea Macrotrema x3
Fishborg Blaster x3
Golden Flying Fish x3
Morphing Jar x1
Oyster Meister x3
Reese the Ice Mistress x3
Royal Swamp Eel x3
Superancient Deepsea King Coelacanth x3
Unshaven Angler x3
Spells: 14
Bait Doll x2
Big Wave Small Wave x2
Dark Hole x1
Gold Sarcophagus x2
Magical Mallet x2
Monster Reborn x1
Moray of Greed x2
Water Hazard x2
Traps: 15
Call of the Haunted x1
Dark Bribe x2
Fish Depth Charge x3
Forgotten Temple of the Deep x3
Mirror Force x1
Solemn Judgment x1
Torrential Tribute x1
Urgent Tuning x3
Extra Deck: 15
Ally of Justice Catastor x1
Black Rose Dragon x1
Chaos King Archfiend x1
Dewloren, Tiger King of Ice Barrier x1
Formula Synchron x2
Goyo Guardian x1
Magical Android x1
Red Dragon Archfiend x2
Red Nova Dragon x1
Shooting Star Dragon x1
Stardust Dragon x2
Thought Ruler Archfiend x1
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:47 pm
personaly i like the 60 limit, it lets u put in more strategy and more sacrifical monsters to use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:40 am
The only problem is that, as competitive players would argue, a 40 card deck increases the probability of getting certain cards.
But I figure... if I run a deck made up of pretty much the exact same strategies and just allow myself more flexibility with my card selection choices, increasing probability of getting certain specific cards shouldn't really be much of a problem.
Hell, I could run a 60-Card Beast deck with the new Closed Forest and it would actually be BETTER than its 40-Card Version because there would be more monsters to pitch, like Nimble Momonga, Nimble Musabi, Super-Nimble Mega Hamster, Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter, and a ton of other stuff that could act as filler. Heck, even Giant Rats would help the deck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:51 am
Legendary Pirate Plasma Hell, I could run a 60-Card Beast deck with the new Closed Forest and it would actually be BETTER than its 40-Card Version. No. No, it absolutely would not be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:10 pm
Mustard Like Soup Legendary Pirate Plasma Hell, I could run a 60-Card Beast deck with the new Closed Forest and it would actually be BETTER than its 40-Card Version. No. No, it absolutely would not be. How did I know someone was gonna say that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
