|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 6:41 pm
Do you guys think that Crush Card Virus will come back to 1? i mean, i just pulled the ultimate rare, alt art, one from the duelist pack kaiba. I honestly dont see it as powerful as people make it out to be
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 6:44 pm
it kills stuff, but i dont see how bad it is either. it's very annoying, but at 1 it should be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:29 pm
crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal.
the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card.
say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card?
say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card.
say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card.
say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card.
crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:52 pm
Yes i would like if it came back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:07 pm
gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. You forgot that everyone else who didn't have a high tier deck just used it with Sangan. But yeah... that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:05 pm
gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. crush card is not bad for the game, it supports overextension. The reason behind the damn thing being broke is 3 turns of looking at the hand, no one really gave a damn about the distruction. Peopel who think the destruction is the reason this card is good is bad at this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:18 pm
gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. Say you playing against LevelEaterMonarch they sac level eater,sangan, dark sea rescue. Say you versing Jinzo FTK/OTK they sac returner jinzo comes out then no traps for you. Say you faced zombies they recycles CCV and keep sacing plaguespreader. Say you face SkullServant deck sac skull servant your big guy gains another grand. To many decks have to many ideas of uses. CCV won't come back I think I'd be nice for it to come back annoying as hell though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:11 pm
Boxxy 110 gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. crush card is not bad for the game, it supports overextension. The reason behind the damn thing being broke is 3 turns of looking at the hand, no one really gave a damn about the distruction. Peopel who think the destruction is the reason this card is good is bad at this game. crush cards destruction is significant. crush tribute sangan, get a plus off of sangan, rip 2+monsters from your opponents hand (when lightsworn got hit by it, they usually got hit hard because of the high stats of all their monsters, same with blackwings during dsf) and see their entire hand? not only do you look, but you go plus and get to set up your turns to play around them, and potentially shut down some of their next turns if they draw a strong enough monster on the following turns) for a long time in the ocg gadgets were a dominant deck (pre-synchro era) because the entire thing works under crush card (which eventually caused crush card to be played less and less in the ocg) we have trap dustshoot to look at peoples hands (25/30 tops for the super version), we dont need crush too(250-350 depending on your area for the gold version). people who make blanket statements based on opinion without doing research are usually bad at this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:53 pm
gohson Boxxy 110 gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. crush card is not bad for the game, it supports overextension. The reason behind the damn thing being broke is 3 turns of looking at the hand, no one really gave a damn about the distruction. Peopel who think the destruction is the reason this card is good is bad at this game. crush cards destruction is significant. crush tribute sangan, get a plus off of sangan, rip 2+monsters from your opponents hand (when lightsworn got hit by it, they usually got hit hard because of the high stats of all their monsters, same with blackwings during dsf) and see their entire hand? not only do you look, but you go plus and get to set up your turns to play around them, and potentially shut down some of their next turns if they draw a strong enough monster on the following turns) for a long time in the ocg gadgets were a dominant deck (pre-synchro era) because the entire thing works under crush card (which eventually caused crush card to be played less and less in the ocg) we have trap dustshoot to look at peoples hands (25/30 tops for the super version), we dont need crush too(250-350 depending on your area for the gold version). people who make blanket statements based on opinion without doing research are usually bad at this game. so far you've only mentioned how much the card is worth and how much destruction it provided. you sir are bad at this game. And no dad return dominated with main decked ccv, if anyone honestly lost to gadgets you deserved to. (note that sentence was past tense). please ******** think you're bad at this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:10 pm
Boxxy 110 gohson Boxxy 110 gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. crush card is not bad for the game, it supports overextension. The reason behind the damn thing being broke is 3 turns of looking at the hand, no one really gave a damn about the distruction. Peopel who think the destruction is the reason this card is good is bad at this game. crush cards destruction is significant. crush tribute sangan, get a plus off of sangan, rip 2+monsters from your opponents hand (when lightsworn got hit by it, they usually got hit hard because of the high stats of all their monsters, same with blackwings during dsf) and see their entire hand? not only do you look, but you go plus and get to set up your turns to play around them, and potentially shut down some of their next turns if they draw a strong enough monster on the following turns) for a long time in the ocg gadgets were a dominant deck (pre-synchro era) because the entire thing works under crush card (which eventually caused crush card to be played less and less in the ocg) we have trap dustshoot to look at peoples hands (25/30 tops for the super version), we dont need crush too(250-350 depending on your area for the gold version). people who make blanket statements based on opinion without doing research are usually bad at this game. so far you've only mentioned how much the card is worth and how much destruction it provided. you sir are bad at this game. And no dad return dominated with main decked ccv, if anyone honestly lost to gadgets you deserved to. (note that sentence was past tense). please ******** think you're bad at this game. i said ocg(ocg dicates the banlist, for the most part), not tcg. tcg dad return and gbs were popular. ocg did not have allure and test tiger, so neither deck was big in japan. the price is based on demand, the better the card the more expensive (also has to do with availability), the card was expensive, very expensive, because it was worth it, just like DAD before all the reprints. you have not read anything, nor are providing any proof against what im saying (not even referencing the right formats that i am addressing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:16 pm
Boxxy 110 gohson Boxxy 110 gohson crush card is bad for the game, im assuming you guys havent played much in (competitively) during the formats it was legal. the only reason crush card wont have an affect now, is because its banned, if it comes back, every deck will have to be re-designed as far as monster lineups go just to play around the card. say your versing against infernity, imagine they tribute a set avenger or necromancer for crush card? say your versing blackwings, now imagine they tribute vayu for crush card. say your versing, a regular old dark armed deck, imagine they tribute plague, mali, sangan etc for crush card. say your versing lightsworn, and they tribute necro gardna (x 3 back in the day) or a plague for crush card. crush card is banned for a reason, and should stay banned. the card used to be like $275, and for a good reason. crush card is not bad for the game, it supports overextension. The reason behind the damn thing being broke is 3 turns of looking at the hand, no one really gave a damn about the distruction. Peopel who think the destruction is the reason this card is good is bad at this game. crush cards destruction is significant. crush tribute sangan, get a plus off of sangan, rip 2+monsters from your opponents hand (when lightsworn got hit by it, they usually got hit hard because of the high stats of all their monsters, same with blackwings during dsf) and see their entire hand? not only do you look, but you go plus and get to set up your turns to play around them, and potentially shut down some of their next turns if they draw a strong enough monster on the following turns) for a long time in the ocg gadgets were a dominant deck (pre-synchro era) because the entire thing works under crush card (which eventually caused crush card to be played less and less in the ocg) we have trap dustshoot to look at peoples hands (25/30 tops for the super version), we dont need crush too(250-350 depending on your area for the gold version). people who make blanket statements based on opinion without doing research are usually bad at this game. so far you've only mentioned how much the card is worth and how much destruction it provided. you sir are bad at this game. And no dad return dominated with main decked ccv, if anyone honestly lost to gadgets you deserved to. (note that sentence was past tense). please ******** think you're bad at this game. also if all you got from all that was the 3 or 4 sentences i mentioned the price comparison. then im done here, you clearly dont read, and asking me to think im bad at the game and trying to trash talk me doesnt support arguments; doesnt matter if its online or in real life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:22 pm
Pretty sure everything has to come back eventually at least once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jevan R. H. Divinitive Crew
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:15 am
It will never return just as Chaos Emperor Dragon will never return.
At the moment it doesn't affect Dandywarrior and Infernity.
It would kill X-Saber and Glads.
Frogs are 50/50 depending on the type of Frog deck.
Every Infernity deck could run it brilliantly and many other decks would appear just because of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
