|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:28 pm
Deck list:
Monsters:
Garoth Lightsworn Warrior x3
Jain Lightsworn Paladin x3
Aurkus Lightsworn Druid x3
Celestia Lightsworn Angel x3
Judgment Dragon x2
Honest x2
Ryko Lightsworn Hunter x2
Battle Fader x2
Wulf Lightsworn Beast
Lyla Lightsworn Sorceress
Ehren Lightsworn Monk
Morphing Jar
Lumina Lightsworn Summoner
Shire Lightsworn Spirit
Necro Gardna
Sangan
Spells:
Solar Recharge x3
Pot of Avarice
Heavy Storm
Charge of The Light Brigade
Gold Sarcophagus
Traps:
Threatening Roar x3
Trap Stun x2
Beckoning Light x2
Mirror Force
So how does this look? i am still working on it but so far with these cards I am winning most of my duels
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:37 pm
i don't see a need for 3 celestia. 2 is fine. the battle faders are iffy, but i can understand having them for when jd dies and it was the only thing you had on your field.
shire is bad tech. add more lyla.
sangan i can understand, but it's not needed. add more lyla.
morphing jar? add more wulf.
ehren? add more wulf.
avarice is bad tech on a deck that wants deck thinning. add 2 monster reincarnation and take out the third aurkus aswell.
that puts your deck at 41 instead of 43. add a third trap stun, ryko or monster reincarnation for 42 cards, the optimum limit for lightsworn deck thickness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:42 pm
axean i don't see a need for 3 celestia. 2 is fine. the battle faders are iffy, but i can understand having them for when jd dies and it was the only thing you had on your field. shire is bad tech. add more lyla. sangan i can understand, but it's not needed. add more lyla. morphing jar? add more wulf. ehren? add more wulf. avarice is bad tech on a deck that wants deck thinning. add 2 monster reincarnation and take out the third aurkus aswell. that puts your deck at 41 instead of 43. add a third trap stun, ryko or monster reincarnation for 42 cards, the optimum limit for lightsworn deck thickness. wel I only have one wulf so I can't add them right now and some of these cards I don't have but I like it so for now these are helping me out and I am winning most of my duels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:59 pm
yeah the guy has a good point an im not sure if i saw the lumina or not but im to lazy to check p.o.a. is ok tech i like it just in case u want to put back the wulfs so u can celstia again or if u nee an honest 3 gareth i think u will mill yourself out before anything happens i like 2 gareths 3 lylas 2 erin (monk) 3 wulf 1 arkus and 2 or 3 ryko since that damn dog can pop any card on the field
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:49 am
axean i don't see a need for 3 celestia. 2 is fine. axean the battle faders are iffy, but i can understand having them for when jd dies and it was the only thing you had on your field. axean shire is bad tech. add more lyla. axean sangan i can understand, but it's not needed. add more lyla. axean morphing jar? add more wulf. ehren? add more wulf. axean avarice is bad tech on a deck that wants deck thinning. add 2 monster reincarnation and take out the third aurkus as well. axean that puts your deck at 41 instead of 43. add a third trap stun, ryko or monster reincarnation for 42 cards, the optimum limit for lightsworn deck thickness.
OP:
3 Celestia, Lightsworn Angel
3 Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress
2 Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter
2 Jain, Lightsworn Paladin
2 Wulf, Lightsworn Beast
2 Judgment Dragon
2 Honest
1 Shire, Lightsworn Spirit
1 Ehren, Lightsworn Monk
1 Aurkus, Lightsworn Priest
1 Garoth, Lightsworn Warrior
1 Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner
1 Necro Gardna
1 Archlord Kristya
1 Plaguespreader Zombie
3 Solar Recharge
1 Charge of the Light Brigade
1 Reinforcement of the Army
1 Monster Reincarnation
1 Heavy Storm
1 Mystical Space Typhoon
1 Cold Wave
1 Brain Control
1 My Body as a Shield
2 Beckoning Light
1 Torrential Tribute
1 Mirror Force
1 Trap Dustshoot
You can change it around from there - whether you prefer a Gorz over Kristya, or even Shield Warrior over Shire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:30 am
This baffles me, how can you run lightsworn beatdown, without their best beatstick?
What the hell seriously.
Gragonith, is who I'm talking about it, in case you forgot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:22 pm
well my deck is now updated when i find the deck box that it is in i will write it down for you but I traded the battle faders last night so they are no more and i got 2 more wulfs and I got a DAD (I might trade it if the offer is good)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:25 pm
Who said Ehren is bad tech?
I'm playing Ehren in a deck that's NOT LS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:44 pm
Moosenstein This baffles me, how can you run lightsworn beatdown, without their best beatstick? What the hell seriously. Gragonith, is who I'm talking about it, in case you forgot. gargonith sucks hard. And freeds build = yes -a lyla, celestia or ryko + a card trooper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:18 pm
Aya_Aki_kun Moosenstein This baffles me, how can you run lightsworn beatdown, without their best beatstick? What the hell seriously. Gragonith, is who I'm talking about it, in case you forgot. gargonith sucks hard. And freeds build = yes -a lyla, celestia or ryko + a card trooper
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:28 pm
Freed the Benevolent Card Trooper is horrible. A couple people have topped Regional's here with a mained Trooper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:02 pm
Synaku_Blade Freed the Benevolent Card Trooper is horrible. A couple people have topped Regional's here with a mained Trooper.
It's silly to say "it's good" just because you see a list top with it, because to be frank, the very least 50% lists are bogus and stupid. It's also at a time closer to the next National Championship where all of the good players and the good decks have already earned their invite. This is just the period where you get to see whatever's left behind get a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:54 am
I never said it's good, I wouldn't play it in LS.
Just saying other people don't think it's horrible either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:47 pm
Aya_Aki_kun Moosenstein This baffles me, how can you run lightsworn beatdown, without their best beatstick? What the hell seriously. Gragonith, is who I'm talking about it, in case you forgot. gargonith sucks hard. And freeds build = yes -a lyla, celestia or ryko + a card trooper It's a beatdown deck, not a generic lightsworn deck. Why the hell wouldn't you have a 1 tribute 4000 attack piercing monster in it? neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:32 am
Moosenstein Aya_Aki_kun Moosenstein This baffles me, how can you run lightsworn beatdown, without their best beatstick? What the hell seriously. Gragonith, is who I'm talking about it, in case you forgot. gargonith sucks hard. And freeds build = yes -a lyla, celestia or ryko + a card trooper It's a beatdown deck, not a generic lightsworn deck. Why the hell wouldn't you have a 1 tribute 4000 attack piercing monster in it? neutral
But look at the list - it's Lightsworn. Not a beat-down meant to summon monster after monster until your opponent has no Life Points left never loosening the field, it's Lightsworn. The names are there, Judgment Dragon is there, the Spell and Trap lineup almost fits that of standard. This isn't wholly Lightsworn Beatdown, but the OP's adjustment of the standard to the new list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
