|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:46 am
that their may be a chance of treeborn frog gettin un-limited in the next list. anyone think their may be some truth to this?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:35 am
i dont really see why not tho. i mean if there are mote than one in the grave during standby only one gets its effect so two extra ones in there actually becom useless. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:58 pm
It was only limited because of old school manarchs. Idk If PC ran it but i see not reason why is should not be at three. It Provides you with the same Plus but with a little more cosistancy added to it. We will just have to wait for the list. Thats all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 3:59 pm
With rumors of Ultimate Offering getting unlimited, there is just absolutely no way that Treeborn would follow suit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:40 pm
There's a big Chance it will be put three, just for the same reason Twin-headed Behemoth was put back at three, Only one of the three gets it's effect.
although, With Twin-headed Behemoth it's a little more severe because it's effect can only be used once per duel; treeborn on the otherhand can be used repeatedly, meaning if one gets RFG'd, the second one picks up the slack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:15 am
I have no idea if they will or not but if they are thinking of unlimiting it then its more likly to go semi then unlimited. Putting in two will allow Konami to see if it does make an impact. If it doesn't then it may go to three in the ban list after.
But I'm more interested in seeing what will be the banned cards they unban. They are trying to give cards on the ban list a chance and unbanning a few at a time for a while just to see if they are still as powerful as they used to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
