I've been thinking about this for a few months, and I've finally gotten around to asking the community.
Besides murder being a commandment sin, did L have any other reason to hate or want to arrest Light? The lengths that he went to to get Light to confess were borderline interrogation, and without significant evidence, it was clearly shown that he was breaking several laws to prove something that he had no evidence of.
As an L fan, it's been hard for me to stay on his side, because Light's mentality seems to be more prominant in thinking, rather than L, whom you don't know what he was thinking. If he had no significant evidence against Light, should he have been allowed to keep him in confinement? There was no other evidence in my knowledge of law that would have allowed L to do to Light as he did.
It's a little jumbled, but what do you guys think about this?
Besides murder being a commandment sin, did L have any other reason to hate or want to arrest Light? The lengths that he went to to get Light to confess were borderline interrogation, and without significant evidence, it was clearly shown that he was breaking several laws to prove something that he had no evidence of.
As an L fan, it's been hard for me to stay on his side, because Light's mentality seems to be more prominant in thinking, rather than L, whom you don't know what he was thinking. If he had no significant evidence against Light, should he have been allowed to keep him in confinement? There was no other evidence in my knowledge of law that would have allowed L to do to Light as he did.
It's a little jumbled, but what do you guys think about this?