|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Boadicia It's pretty much been decided that a fluffy bunny is someone who delves too far into the happy light side of paganism while almost, if not completely, disregarding the dark side. I disagree with this definition. Really- a fluffy bunny is someone who ignores objective reality in favor of personal delusion or favors flawed sources because it furthers self-aggrandizing mythos.
There is room for “light” and UPG within serious traditions; it just shouldn’t be touted to create historical and theological revisionism and delusion.
Quote: Is there a term, or anything else for that matter, regarding the other side of the extreme, a person who goes too far into the dark (so to speak) while ignoring the happy light side? I'm not refering to any religion that's extremely pessimistic, but religions that seek to strike balances between the two. Fluffies are fluffies- no matter if they are obsessed with pretty shiny or dank darkness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|