|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:39 pm
|
|
|
|
Different people have different ideas of what denotes craft. I n my experiance many will count that as being folk wisdom. Very few fam trads are what some of the fluffy books make them out to be. SO what denotes fam trad in the sense of folk wisdom etc? Well; Some are families of seer's Some are families of healers Some are keepers of lore Some are makers of philters Some are weavers at the loom Some are followers of tradition Some are watchers of death Some are bringers of birth Some are herder's of cattle Some are turners of the wheel Some are turners of the sod Some are collecters of silver Some are finders of blue glass
None that I have ever come across are more than three or four of the things I listed above. And none that I have ever come across are anything close to what would be called Wicca, either in the context of BTW or of more modern ecclectic. Many people in Ireland are from families who are, or once were, one of the above, directley or inderectly. Question is when in any given family such traditions were phased out and to what extent. Similar could be said in certain other parts of Europe. For example, while travelling in genovese provence, I was walking through a tiny village, the church bells rang, from doorways along the street women came and gathered under a tree on the path that leads to the woods. There they brought their cook books and discussed what they would cook for dinner for their families, what ingredients they had and which they needed. Sharing recipies and ingredients for the individual family and wider village benifit. The oldest of the women advised on 'additions' for each household. This to me is living family tradition. To my mind, unless they happen to have studies Wicca along the way (such as the Sybil Leek) they do not cast circles and call upon the guardians and elements and Goddess and God. New family traditions are being created all the time as 1st and 2nd generation pagans and witches are raising their children within their world view and passing on knowledge and lore of things that aren't taught in schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:49 pm
|
|
|
|
Nuri ShadowSharrow . The only bit I would quibble with is the inclusion of Robin Artisson. As would I. I am fast approaching the conclusion that the man is insane, a con, or both. Actually, I think I am just confused as to which he is, but I am sure he is one of them.
I'm not even sure who the hell that is. neutral
Edit: Oof. Found him.
What a douchebag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:40 pm
|
|
|
|
Kalyani Srijoi Nuri ShadowSharrow . The only bit I would quibble with is the inclusion of Robin Artisson. As would I. I am fast approaching the conclusion that the man is insane, a con, or both. Actually, I think I am just confused as to which he is, but I am sure he is one of them. I'm not even sure who the hell that is. neutral Edit: Oof. Found him. What a douchebag.
Now now a douchebag has a purpose and can be useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:44 pm
|
|
|
|
ShadowSharrow Kalyani Srijoi Nuri ShadowSharrow . The only bit I would quibble with is the inclusion of Robin Artisson. As would I. I am fast approaching the conclusion that the man is insane, a con, or both. Actually, I think I am just confused as to which he is, but I am sure he is one of them. I'm not even sure who the hell that is. neutral Edit: Oof. Found him. What a douchebag. Now now a douchebag has a purpose and can be useful.
Good point.
I would never let him anywhere near my v****a.
I really like how he's all, "I don't hate Christians, but..." Yeah, when you make a list of seven things Christians aren't likely to do, and then put 'admit they were wrong' at the top of the list. Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:16 am
|
|
|
|
ShadowSharrow Kalyani Srijoi Nuri ShadowSharrow . The only bit I would quibble with is the inclusion of Robin Artisson. As would I. I am fast approaching the conclusion that the man is insane, a con, or both. Actually, I think I am just confused as to which he is, but I am sure he is one of them. I'm not even sure who the hell that is. neutral Edit: Oof. Found him. What a douchebag. Now now a douchebag has a purpose and can be useful.
I don't know about that. Penn and Teller referred to John Edwards as the "Biggest Douchebag in the Universe" and that's pretty much my opinion of him--and I can't possibly think of anyone else who is more worthless than John Edwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:08 am
|
|
|
|
Nice has soo many meanings.
Quote: 1. pleasing; agreeable; delightful: a nice visit. 2. amiably pleasant; kind: They are always nice to strangers. 3. characterized by, showing, or requiring great accuracy, precision, skill, tact, care, or delicacy: nice workmanship; a nice shot; a nice handling of a crisis. 4. showing or indicating very small differences; minutely accurate, as instruments: a job that requires nice measurements. 5. minute, fine, or subtle: a nice distinction. 6. having or showing delicate, accurate perception: a nice sense of color. 7. refined in manners, language, etc.: Nice people wouldn't do such things. 8. virtuous; respectable; decorous: a nice girl. 9. suitable or proper: That was not a nice remark. 10. carefully neat in dress, habits, etc. 11. (esp. of food) dainty or delicate. 12. having fastidious, finicky, or fussy tastes: They're much too nice in their dining habits to enjoy an outdoor barbecue. 13. Obsolete. coy, shy, or reluctant. 14. Obsolete. unimportant; trivial. 15. Obsolete. wanton.
I really dislike that words are losing their myraid of means it vertainly makes it harder to get away with as many in ur endos as they become dumbed down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:11 pm
|
|
|
|
Ok, reading the replies here, mainly regarding Artisson... what is it that people are finding that makes him seem "insane"?
Just in case anyone here doesn't know, there is a bit of background to Artisson's presence on the net. A man (whom I think was studying under Artisson, I forget his name) began to turn on him and not only take over Artisson's website to make it a forum for hate mongering, but spread a lot of vicious and unfounded rumours about him on forums and websites, including claims of plagarism, adultary and criminal activity (none of which have ever been varified). There's even an Encyclopedia Dramatica page about Artisson spouting all sorts of rubbish as a result.
It's all a bunch of personal issues between Artisson and the other man, and I don't see why that should tarnish the great work he's done on Witchcraft. Neither should any of the personal opinions he holds. After all, Gardner has often been labeled a sex-crazed nudist, but that doesn't make his work any less reputable on the subject of Wicca.
I have read Artisson's main work on Trad Craft, as well as being a member of his mail group (speaking to him personally a few times myself), and despite what a lot of people say, the man has very coherant, and deep concepts... not to mention workable. Where are people in this thread drawing their opinions? Unless there's something I'm not yet aware of, in which case I'd like to see what it is.
~~~~
Re: Deo on Fate/Wyrd
Forgive the misunderstanding, I wrote that part when I was still partly unfamiliar with the concepts, and it was only a brief mention made in passing, without further explaination or attention. I'll edit it asap. I know the two are not interchangable, and I didn't mean to write it that way, so I'll word it differently when I re-write it. ^^;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|