|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:51 pm
Quote:
3 Madolche Puddingcess
3 Madolche Messengelato
3 Madolche Magileine
2 Madolche Butlerusk
3 Madolche Mewfeuille
2 Madolche Baaple
1 Neo Spacian Grand Mole3 Madolche Chateau
2 Madolche Ticket
2 Mystical Space Typhoon
2 Pot of Duality
1 Monster Reborn
1 Heavy Storm
1 Dark Hole
1 Book of Moon
1 Reinforcement of the Army2 Fiendish Chain
2 Madolche Lesson
2 Solemn Warning
1 Solemn Judgment
1 Safe Zone
1 Ultimate OfferingExtra3 Madolche Queen Tiaramisu 2 Fairy King Albverdich 2 Number 39: Utopia 1 Number C39: Utopia Ray 1 Leviathan Dragon 1 Stardust Dragon (siding Starlight Road)1 Number 30: Acid Golem 1 Wind-Up Zenmaines 1 Adreus, Keeper of Armageddon 1 Chimeratech Fortress Dragon 1 Gaia Dragon, The Thunder Charger (side decking mind control)Thoughts?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:32 pm
Thought about their effects and made these changes. Quote: + 2 Madolche Lesson+1 Book of Moon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:55 am
-malefic stardust
You dont want anythimg that will hit the grave
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:04 am
OC ReMix -malefic stardust You dont want anythimg that will hit the grave That's where Madolche Lesson comes in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:28 am
3 puddingcess seems like too much to me. maybe just 2? add another butlerusk instead. he's the deck's field searcher afterall.
and baaple is really good with puddingcess. siwtch bapple and an opponant's monster to def, (baaple has 2300 def with field spell, 1800 without) then run over the def monster with puddingcess, then pop a card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:32 am
Oucyan 3 puddingcess seems like too much to me. maybe just 2? add another butlerusk instead. he's the deck's field searcher afterall. and baaple is really good with puddingcess. siwtch bapple and an opponant's monster to def, (baaple has 2300 def with field spell, 1800 without) then run over the def monster with puddingcess, then pop a card. also. no malefic stardust. once again, poopoo in deck. lesson and tiarsmisu are enough. also, the only rank 5 in abyss rising is a spellbook support monster, you can't even make it with puddingcess because it needs 2 spellcasters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:34 pm
Oucyan Oucyan 3 puddingcess seems like too much to me. maybe just 2? add another butlerusk instead. he's the deck's field searcher afterall. and baaple is really good with puddingcess. siwtch bapple and an opponant's monster to def, (baaple has 2300 def with field spell, 1800 without) then run over the def monster with puddingcess, then pop a card. also. no malefic stardust. once again, poopoo in deck. lesson and tiarsmisu are enough. also, the only rank 5 in abyss rising is a spellbook support monster, you can't even make it with puddingcess because it needs 2 spellcasters. The reason I went 1 butlerusk and 3 mesengellato is because RotA when I have mewfuille in hand to crack him for any madolche spell. Two butlerusk felt like too many because of this bit I can test it out. Stardust is bad even though it protects the field and can be shuffled back in with lesson? Also. Baaple is kinda bad. In a format where everything swings for 2500+, 2300 def won't do much. I do like the synergy with puddingcess though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:54 pm
After further review, You guys are right about Malefic, Butlerusk and Baaple.
Haven't quite used Baaple's effect with Puddingcess just yet but I'm updating the decklist now.
Found myself a couple of Safe Zones to put in. 1 in main and 1 in side.
I can essentially side deck between the XYZ and control builds at will.
Second Utopia, the Fairy Kings, and the Adreus will eventually turn into the Djinns when I find them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:59 am
just dueled this deck on DN. barely won. what a ******** annoying deck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:04 pm
Oucyan just dueled this deck on DN. barely won. what a ******** annoying deck. it is....veeeeeery nice. Puddingcess is straight OP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:19 am
Pheso Oucyan just dueled this deck on DN. barely won. what a ******** annoying deck. it is....veeeeeery nice. Puddingcess is straight OP The Deck does not like D-fissure or macro which is sided and the deck hates Thunder King Raioh cuz you lose searching for your monsters and spells
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:50 am
OC ReMix Pheso Oucyan just dueled this deck on DN. barely won. what a ******** annoying deck. it is....veeeeeery nice. Puddingcess is straight OP The Deck does not like D-fissure or macro which is sided and the deck hates Thunder King Raioh cuz you lose searching for your monsters and spells It does not....but Macro Decks do not like Puddingcess or a Royal Decree/Light/Shadow Mirror sideboard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
