Call of Duty: Black Ops II

[Doctr IceTiger]

Any thoughts on Call of Duty 9?
The campaign will be sandbox style, meaning the player can make choices that will affect the story. This confirms that the campaign will have multiple endings. The campaign will also take place in the 1980s for the first 1/3 of the game, and in 2025 for the final 2/3. Jason Hudson, Alex Mason, and Viktor Reznov will be returning in the campaign as playable characters.The majority of the game, as indicated by the trailer, appears to be set in war-torn Los Angeles in the year 2025. David Mason, son of Alex Mason, will be the main protagonist of the game. You can see more information at Call of Duty Wikia
Reveal Trailer here- Call of Duty: Black Ops II- Reveal Trailer.  

[SideEffekt]

it'll probably be better than modern warfare 3...looks promising, hope they change it up more than just adding new kill streaks and perks  

[Cody Party Pie]

Does anyone else think it's pointless to have tanks with legs? They move much slower and don't get through as much terrain. May look cool, but it's just pointless.  

[Unit Blue]

Death_354

Does anyone else think it's pointless to have tanks with legs? They move much slower and don't get through as much terrain. May look cool, but it's just pointless.

Lot's of futuristic games have those. It's a cliche.  

[Cody Party Pie]

Unit Blue

Death_354

Does anyone else think it's pointless to have tanks with legs? They move much slower and don't get through as much terrain. May look cool, but it's just pointless.

Lot's of futuristic games have those. It's a cliche.

It's still pointless. In a battle between Normal tank vs. Futuristic tank with legs, the normal ones would totally win. Just shoot off one leg and it's pretty much ********.  

[Unit Blue]

Death_354

Unit Blue

Death_354

Does anyone else think it's pointless to have tanks with legs? They move much slower and don't get through as much terrain. May look cool, but it's just pointless.

Lot's of futuristic games have those. It's a cliche.

It's still pointless. In a battle between Normal tank vs. Futuristic tank with legs, the normal ones would totally win. Just shoot off one leg and it's pretty much ********.

Your right. But you sure those are walking tanks or walking gunners? Because in Battlefield 2142, it had these Walkers that were primarily against units, humvees (land vehicles), and also air units. So yea, the tank was still strong against it but this thing was strong against units, as in it could just crush things under it's feet. The only effective thing was a RPG, but it's a game so it still had life.

But idk, I haven't seen CoD BlckOps2 trailer that well yet, so a walking tank does suck..  

[Doctr IceTiger]

This is the most replies I've ever gotten on a thread :,)  

[Cody Party Pie]

Unit Blue

Death_354

Unit Blue

Death_354

Does anyone else think it's pointless to have tanks with legs? They move much slower and don't get through as much terrain. May look cool, but it's just pointless.

Lot's of futuristic games have those. It's a cliche.

It's still pointless. In a battle between Normal tank vs. Futuristic tank with legs, the normal ones would totally win. Just shoot off one leg and it's pretty much ********.

Your right. But you sure those are walking tanks or walking gunners? Because in Battlefield 2142, it had these Walkers that were primarily against units, humvees (land vehicles), and also air units. So yea, the tank was still strong against it but this thing was strong against units, as in it could just crush things under it's feet. The only effective thing was a RPG, but it's a game so it still had life.

But idk, I haven't seen CoD BlckOps2 trailer that well yet, so a walking tank does suck..

I wasn't too interested to look into it, I was just like wtf  

[Asian Gasm]

It looks so much better than MW3.
And I'm a big Zombies fan so I am looking forward to the new zombie maps and all the other things that they added to it.