Machina Gadgets = Subliminal Advertising? | Page 2 | Domino City | Guild Forums

oucyan

Lavish Demigod

32,400 Points

100
200
100

Offline

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:24 pm

Old man Falconstein

Kids stop this b***h fight or I will realease Timmy on your butts.

Now does the gears homage gears of war, nope.

But there allot of cards who make homage to konami games like gradius cards, tactical spy to metal gear and vampire lord to castlevania....in a way......or maybe the skull servants to castlevania.....just something.

the Gradius and BES cards are based on Konami's Gradius game. Aitsu and Doitsu and the green and yellow ones are also from an old konami game.

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:15 pm

axean

Old man Falconstein

Kids stop this b***h fight or I will realease Timmy on your butts.

Now does the gears homage gears of war, nope.

But there allot of cards who make homage to konami games like gradius cards, tactical spy to metal gear and vampire lord to castlevania....in a way......or maybe the skull servants to castlevania.....just something.

the Gradius and BES cards are based on Konami's Gradius game. Aitsu and Doitsu and the green and yellow ones are also from an old konami game.

Aitsu and Doitsu come from the gradius parody parodius.

I just wished they made the metal gear rex card......so much win

Old man Falconstein

Offline

armycat jockamoe

Offline

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:34 pm

armycat jockamoe

Except for the fact that both Gadgets and the original Machina guys came out before Gears of War.

So you know Gears of War is an homage to them.

Since it came up I just want you all to know I meant the homage line to be a joke.

Read as " So you know Gears of War is an homage to them./Sarcasm" it makes more sense.

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:34 pm

Kunx the Mighty

axean

armycat saw the similiarity after i mentioned it. but he reversed it to be chronological.

No all he said was that the first set of Machina monsters where released before GoW and that GoW was a reference to those monsters which would make EVEN LESS SENSE!

Redundant statement is redundant