Steel Sterling
The problem with "Enterprise"-and I saw it coming before the series began-
is that Rick Berman decided that CONTINUITY wasn't going to matter a lot.
So, he decided the dedicated fans wouldn't COUNT.
That's how the show got confusing.
You go in knowing that the NCC 1701 Enterprise and her sister ships of
the Constitution class were the first Federation ships to get phasers.
In fact, the USS Hood was THE first to get retro-fitted. Then Berman
says "nuts to that" and moves their invention back 200 years.
Of course, now there's been nearly 200 years of stagnation between all
the inventions-now backdated to Enterprise- and TNG, with the exceptions
of experiments. (The transwarp drive, the phased cloak, better torpedoes.)
Here is something that a lot of people dont understand about this. It is also something that only a few or the writers explained. When they did this show, at first they tried to be as loyal to the series as they could, but they wanted to show that there were impacts to the timeline that were changed due to temporal involvement as well as other time travel problems.
For instance, never in the other series was there any mention of a Temporal War. That could explain a lot. It could also mean that those time lines were not corrupted and that the original corruption came from those time lines.
Another example is there was never any, and I repeat never any mention of anything wrong with the first flight of the Pheonix. In this series, it takes that into consequence as well. My example of that is the episode "Regeneration".
I could keep giving you examples if you want.
So when you are watching this you have to take into consideration that Star Trek deals with time travel and the effects of what happens with chronological changes.
One other thing was that they also had to take into consideration , which Gene Rodenberry did when he made the jump to TNG, was the technologcial advance we as a people in real life have achieved. Dont know how many of you knew, but he actually talked with some scientist from NASA for all of this technology because he wanted to make sure that what he put in his shows was really possible. For example, we do have for military experiments phase technologies (very crude models and theories), and have made the jump to actual cloaking technology with the military applications soon to be applied in the US military over the next couple of years. That cloaking technology is actually not a joke either. British and American scientists have actually come up with a material, a cloak if you will, that actually bends light.
You have to take all of this into consideration when judging any of the series. So Enterprise was not all that bad in context. It was better than DS9 when you have to take it into the big picture.
I am thinking of starting a thread that compares Star Trek technologies with real life technologies along with trying to apply them to the respective series. If anyone is interested, please PM me so I know there is actual interest.