|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 11:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:53 pm
|
|
|
|
StillBored123 Really stupid question here but as I was reading on wiki I came across something that completely confused me: Quote: With the growth and spread of large, Neopagan gatherings and festivals in the 1980s, public varieties of Neo-Wicca continued to further diversify into additional, eclectic sub-denominations, often heavily influenced by the New Age and counter-culture movements. These open, loosely-structured or unstructured traditions contrast with British Traditional Wicca, which emphasizes secrecy and initiatory lineage.[24] That sounds incorrect... It is incorrect the Neo-Wicca right? Neo-Wicca, at least from what I know, isn't lineaged.
Not that Wicca is all that old, but hey, the stuff claiming to be Wicca that isn't lineaged is even newer, so I guess the term "works?"
Depending on who you ask, only lineaged Wica is actual Wica, or other forms of Wica can exist.
For some reason, I think to all the splits that Christianity has had over the millenia.
I guess if there were some sort of theological reasoning behind why these "Neo-Wiccans" claim such a title, and it were presented, it'd be more acceptable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:15 pm
|
|
|
|
Gho the Girl StillBored123 Really stupid question here but as I was reading on wiki I came across something that completely confused me: Quote: With the growth and spread of large, Neopagan gatherings and festivals in the 1980s, public varieties of Neo-Wicca continued to further diversify into additional, eclectic sub-denominations, often heavily influenced by the New Age and counter-culture movements. These open, loosely-structured or unstructured traditions contrast with British Traditional Wicca, which emphasizes secrecy and initiatory lineage.[24] That sounds incorrect... It is incorrect the Neo-Wicca right? Neo-Wicca, at least from what I know, isn't lineaged. Not that Wicca is all that old, but hey, the stuff claiming to be Wicca that isn't lineaged is even newer, so I guess the term "works?" Depending on who you ask, only lineaged Wica is actual Wica, or other forms of Wica can exist. For some reason, I think to all the splits that Christianity has had over the millenia. I guess if there were some sort of theological reasoning behind why these "Neo-Wiccans" claim such a title, and it were presented, it'd be more acceptable? And that is exactly why I got confused. Because people have told me that only lineaged Wica is actual Wica. So I was reading the article and everything was seeming to match up and I saw that. Then I thought Wicca isnt more than 50-60 years old.. why would there be Neo-Wicca all ready? And now Im wording what you said at the bottom, would it really be more acceptable? Or would it be shuned by Traditional Wiccans like it all ready has. Ahh confusion! >-<
Sorry I kind of just rambled a little there..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:24 pm
|
|
|
|
StillBored123 Gho the Girl StillBored123 Really stupid question here but as I was reading on wiki I came across something that completely confused me: Quote: With the growth and spread of large, Neopagan gatherings and festivals in the 1980s, public varieties of Neo-Wicca continued to further diversify into additional, eclectic sub-denominations, often heavily influenced by the New Age and counter-culture movements. These open, loosely-structured or unstructured traditions contrast with British Traditional Wicca, which emphasizes secrecy and initiatory lineage.[24] That sounds incorrect... It is incorrect the Neo-Wicca right? Neo-Wicca, at least from what I know, isn't lineaged. Not that Wicca is all that old, but hey, the stuff claiming to be Wicca that isn't lineaged is even newer, so I guess the term "works?" Depending on who you ask, only lineaged Wica is actual Wica, or other forms of Wica can exist. For some reason, I think to all the splits that Christianity has had over the millenia. I guess if there were some sort of theological reasoning behind why these "Neo-Wiccans" claim such a title, and it were presented, it'd be more acceptable? And that is exactly why I got confused. Because people have told me that only lineaged Wica is actual Wica. So I was reading the article and everything was seeming to match up and I saw that. Then I thought Wicca isnt more than 50-60 years old.. why would there be Neo-Wicca all ready? And now Im wording what you said at the bottom, would it really be more acceptable? Or would it be shuned by Traditional Wiccans like it all ready has. Ahh confusion! >-< Sorry I kind of just rambled a little there.. Well, think of it this way: the Catholic Church sees all other sects of Christianity as heresies, however, there are sound theological arguments presented by the founders of protestant movements explaining why they call themselves Christians while disagreeing with the Cathoic and Eastern Orthodox churches.
I haven't seen such an argument presented by "Neo-Wiccans" so I still don't know that in fact they are Wiccans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:13 pm
|
|
|
|
Gho the Girl StillBored123 Gho the Girl StillBored123 Really stupid question here but as I was reading on wiki I came across something that completely confused me: Quote: With the growth and spread of large, Neopagan gatherings and festivals in the 1980s, public varieties of Neo-Wicca continued to further diversify into additional, eclectic sub-denominations, often heavily influenced by the New Age and counter-culture movements. These open, loosely-structured or unstructured traditions contrast with British Traditional Wicca, which emphasizes secrecy and initiatory lineage.[24] That sounds incorrect... It is incorrect the Neo-Wicca right? Neo-Wicca, at least from what I know, isn't lineaged. Not that Wicca is all that old, but hey, the stuff claiming to be Wicca that isn't lineaged is even newer, so I guess the term "works?" Depending on who you ask, only lineaged Wica is actual Wica, or other forms of Wica can exist. For some reason, I think to all the splits that Christianity has had over the millenia. I guess if there were some sort of theological reasoning behind why these "Neo-Wiccans" claim such a title, and it were presented, it'd be more acceptable? And that is exactly why I got confused. Because people have told me that only lineaged Wica is actual Wica. So I was reading the article and everything was seeming to match up and I saw that. Then I thought Wicca isnt more than 50-60 years old.. why would there be Neo-Wicca all ready? And now Im wording what you said at the bottom, would it really be more acceptable? Or would it be shuned by Traditional Wiccans like it all ready has. Ahh confusion! >-< Sorry I kind of just rambled a little there.. Well, think of it this way: the Catholic Church sees all other sects of Christianity as heresies, however, there are sound theological arguments presented by the founders of protestant movements explaining why they call themselves Christians while disagreeing with the Cathoic and Eastern Orthodox churches. I haven't seen such an argument presented by "Neo-Wiccans" so I still don't know that in fact they are Wiccans. Oo that makes sense. That makes alot of sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:15 pm
|
|
|
|
AniMajor True Colours of Destiny I don't ask questions very often but there is one thing I want to know about: Does anyone know what "girding" is? I ask because a few new friends of mine use this practice. Something about arranging stones in patterns. And they have some complex "grids" going on. According to my crystal book, griding is placing specific stones around a person or area to achieve a certain purpose. Like you go and put amethyst pointing inward around you in a circle to relieve stress, or placing tourmaline at the corners of your house for protection. Huh. That reminds me of a documentary I saw where a gay man was given a semi-precious stone from his father. He was supposed to let the light shine through it at a certain angle onto him and supposedly it would cure his homosexuality. Apparently, to paraphrase the man, it's potency was very questionable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|