|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:37 pm
|
|
|
|
Neko_Bast Well, I thought if I just ignored it people would give up. Why not just concede?
Quote: The most comonly used names for the God and the Goddess are Cernunnos and Aradia. Which are not the names of the God and Goddess of Wicca.
So, we have established that the God and Goddess you hold and the Lord and Lady of Wicca are not the Lord and Lady of Wicca (especially considering that one is an Italian Goddess and the other is Celtic- and neither of which have the Dual and Triple Aspects of the O/H King and the MMC concept).
Quote: Some Traditions have different sacred names for the God and Goddess, which is why I don't think the names are necessary. Which would make them not Wicca, understand?
Quote: Also, since everyone can read this and the Sacred Names are supposed to be only known by initiates, I can't give them out just because someone is "testing" me. Not even by PM. I have no way of knowing if they are really initiated. So no, I won't tell you the names. Stop asking. Except, as you are not Oathbound by initiation, you can give them out.
Understand? ~taps keyboard~ I am typing in english yes?
For the love of all things cute and fuzzy, you're a fluffy, get help, learn to admit you are wrong or you're going to be in a heep of trouble with that whole Curse of the Goddess thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:25 am
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai Neko_Bast The most comonly used names for the God and the Goddess are Cernunnos and Aradia. Which are not the names of the God and Goddess of Wicca. So, we have established that the God and Goddess you hold and the Lord and Lady of Wicca are not the Lord and Lady of Wicca (especially considering that one is an Italian Goddess and the other is Celtic- and neither of which have the Dual and Triple Aspects of the O/H King and the MMC concept).
In "A Witchs Bible" Janet and Stewart Farrar state that Gardner used these names for the God and the Goddess. I will agree that it kinda leaves out the O/H King and the MMC concept. I personaly don't really like these name becaue they do leave those consepts out.
TeaDidikai Quote: Also, since everyone can read this and the Sacred Names are supposed to be only known by initiates, I can't give them out just because someone is "testing" me. Not even by PM. I have no way of knowing if they are really initiated. So no, I won't tell you the names. Stop asking. Except, as you are not Oathbound by initiation, you can give them out. Understand? ~taps keyboard~ I am typing in english yes? For the love of all things cute and fuzzy, you're a fluffy, get help, learn to admit you are wrong or you're going to be in a heep of trouble with that whole Curse of the Goddess thing. You are not the "all knowing one." Please stop acting like it. Now if someone who was acualy Wiccan was saying this.....^-^
Edit: I ment to say that some traditions use differnt names, not different sacred names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:28 pm
|
|
|
|
reagun ban Nuri Wait, theres something amiss in the Unicorn tradition. I'm reading through their family tree (which really endears me to them, actually. Very responsible of them) but I'm seeing a problem. I don't really see a connection to Wicca. I see a wonderful family tradition brought by this Lord Merlyn and being taught more openly, where at some point, the term Wicca was applied to them, likely in the era where many thought Wicca and Witchcraft were interchangeable. It seems like a wonderful group actually. I don't agree with their definition of "pagan" for sure, but I can live with that. I'm just struck odd by where they came from. I'm gonna add my (rusty and rather abrasive) 2c to this. Lord Merlyn tought Lady Galadriel magic. Merlyn and Galadriel?!? Are we sure this tradition isn't a parody and that Light Chakra isn't just winding us up, I mean he's actually quite astute.
Looks like my theory was right, The person behind that new book of the law is the same person who is behind the Unicorn group.
Check this out New book of the law
Now look down the end to see who wrote it and who it was published by
While reading the "New" law please do a find on the page and use the word "Atlantis".
And here is more "Lady" Gaderiel
Look at here publishing list. There is no doubt about it.
Here is a commentary i came accross on this Commentary on the "New" law
I'll leave you to your own conclusions on the book of the law...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:22 pm
|
|
|
|
Neko_Bast TeaDidikai You are not Oathbound by initiation. [...] Learn to admit you are wrong or you're going to be in a heep of trouble with that whole Curse of the Goddess thing. You are not the "all knowing one." Please stop acting like it. Now if someone who was acualy Wiccan was saying this...
Hi! I'm actually Wiccan (though I'm not all-knowing), and I agree with TeaDidikai's assertion that one cannot be Wiccan without an Initiation from a valid, lineaged Coven. I am of the opinion that one should not deceive themselves or others by claiming a label that they do not hold. If one is happy with their chosen path, they should call it by its true name, or not name it at all. I personally believe that, when a person is deceptive, they are harming themselves, their magical ability, and (potentially) other people. A practitioner of magic is only as good as their word.
Also, though you have not been bound to the Wiccan oaths through Initiation, your words here have indicated that you have given yourself a "curse" or "oath" that you cannot possibly honour. Thoughts are things, and word is bond. My suggestion is that you release yourself from any further hubris by immediately halting your spread of misinformation. You may take my advice or not, but you will be bound to the consequences of your choice. I hope that, in the future, you will grow in your understanding and satisfaction with yourself and your path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|