|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 3:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 3:23 pm
|
|
|
|
Uulmshar Matasoga Uulmshar I don't think there should be a drinking age at all. Are there any developed countries in the world that have no drinking age at all? Not that I have heard of, but I'm not interested in "developed," "developing," or "undeveloped:" I just want to live my life and not have a government knocking down my door every few days for letting my kids have wine with dinner or walk around naked. Well then, there you have it. While your "power to the people" rhetoric and implications of hyper-legislation are one thing, the fact of the matter is that alcohol, is more dangerous, especially if introduced at a young enough age and while the body is still developing, it can be incredibly dependence-forming. Unlike most other substances, sudden deprivation can actually kill you. This isn't an issue that should be left up to children or parenting. That would be why you don't hear of developed countries having age requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 4:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 4:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Matasoga Uulmshar Matasoga Uulmshar I don't think there should be a drinking age at all. Are there any developed countries in the world that have no drinking age at all? Not that I have heard of, but I'm not interested in "developed," "developing," or "undeveloped:" I just want to live my life and not have a government knocking down my door every few days for letting my kids have wine with dinner or walk around naked. Well then, there you have it. While your "power to the people" rhetoric and implications of hyper-legislation are one thing, the fact of the matter is that alcohol, is more dangerous, especially if introduced at a young enough age and while the body is still developing, it can be incredibly dependence-forming. Unlike most other substances, sudden deprivation can actually kill you. This isn't an issue that should be left up to children or parenting. That would be why you don't hear of developed countries having age requirements. Alright, believe what you will; I just think it's safer to introduce children to alcohol young, so they learn responsibility and moderation, as opposed to waiting until they find it on their own, and probably learn the hard way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 3:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distinct Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 11:43 am
|
|
|
|
No, because there is of course reasoning to why it is 21... By standards, you're not mature enough to be responsible with your drinking... like, for example, how the driving age is about 16... and the smoking/sex/voting/an adult age is 18... Sure, you can do it younger... but on average, are you mature enough for it?... The answer is no... Sure, at 18 you can drink... and people do drink... but what about them?... There are those that usually drink until they're 'drunk'... which isn't very good to be doing, for many cases it goes over the limit... not to mention the amount of time they're drinking... but 21 year olds, they're usually wise enough to really drink more responsibly... not to say an 18 year old won't drink responsibly... or that a 21 year old will at all times drink responsibly… but basically... if 18 year olds are breaking a law to drink, I wouldn’t doubt they're breaking the legal limit once or twice... which doesn’t help they’re case in possibly wanting a lower legal drinking age… not to mention that to a younger body it's usually more harmful than a more developed one... plus, if we give 18 year olds any more new privileges... they'll pretty much have nothing much to wait for and be bored of life by age 19. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 6:47 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
klgirebdnchajdelfianemdke
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:06 am
|
|
|
|
Lady Button I don't see how genetics in meat for the public consumptions, the FDA, the zoo, and turkey breasts have to do with the issue at hand. The argument the "If you can vote/die for your country, you should be able to drink," is a poor argument and, in my personal opinion, makes no sense. I don't see any correlations. On the issue at hand, I think the age limit is perfectly fine. I don't think it's that much of an issue.
You know you're in love when you can't fall asleep...
To be honest that sort of logic just has a certain air of foolishness. Hey, dying in the military and voting are both idiotic, so why can't you drink? That's just as idiotic, if not more so!
...because reality is finally better than your dreams...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|