|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 8:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 12:44 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
Erix Griffon Nebelstern Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. Now wasn't THAT a good film? sweatdrop No. It really wasn't. It was a massacre. I was prepared for the fact that lots of the most classic dialogue yet written would have to go. But I don't think they can square cutting out quite as much as they did with the vast tracks of new, pointless, nonsensical unfunny material they added. The casting was nigh on perfect, I'll give them that. But they utterly changed the entire focus of the film. As a film in its own right, it wasn't bad. As an adaptation of the book, it was terrible. Adding a love story was nothing short of standing there with a big pot of Hollywood Paint and a large brush, and just slopping it over everything. You can't really complain about the changing of the plot. After al, remember that the books, the TV series, radio series, game and bath towel are all deeply contradictory to one another. It's very likely that the changes to the plot were actually planned by Douglas Adams. However, I haven't seen the film yet and so I won't comment on the quality of it...
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 1:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 2:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 2:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 2:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 2:55 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 10:35 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
whapcapn Erix Griffon Nebelstern Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. Now wasn't THAT a good film? sweatdrop No. It really wasn't. It was a massacre. I was prepared for the fact that lots of the most classic dialogue yet written would have to go. But I don't think they can square cutting out quite as much as they did with the vast tracks of new, pointless, nonsensical unfunny material they added. The casting was nigh on perfect, I'll give them that. But they utterly changed the entire focus of the film. As a film in its own right, it wasn't bad. As an adaptation of the book, it was terrible. Adding a love story was nothing short of standing there with a big pot of Hollywood Paint and a large brush, and just slopping it over everything. You can't really complain about the changing of the plot. After al, remember that the books, the TV series, radio series, game and bath towel are all deeply contradictory to one another. It's very likely that the changes to the plot were actually planned by Douglas Adams. However, I haven't seen the film yet and so I won't comment on the quality of it...
The original is on Radio4 right now..
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foetus In Fetu Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 1:15 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
whapcapn Erix Griffon Nebelstern Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. Now wasn't THAT a good film? sweatdrop No. It really wasn't. It was a massacre. I was prepared for the fact that lots of the most classic dialogue yet written would have to go. But I don't think they can square cutting out quite as much as they did with the vast tracks of new, pointless, nonsensical unfunny material they added. The casting was nigh on perfect, I'll give them that. But they utterly changed the entire focus of the film. As a film in its own right, it wasn't bad. As an adaptation of the book, it was terrible. Adding a love story was nothing short of standing there with a big pot of Hollywood Paint and a large brush, and just slopping it over everything. You can't really complain about the changing of the plot. After al, remember that the books, the TV series, radio series, game and bath towel are all deeply contradictory to one another. It's very likely that the changes to the plot were actually planned by Douglas Adams. However, I haven't seen the film yet and so I won't comment on the quality of it... I have a book.In the foreword he said that that version was the one he choose as to have the "real" plot. It had love in it. I think that was the 4th book. But I havent seen the film so I dont know whether its the right girl. Ive forgotten the name of his true love but she game from earth(alternative dimension, one in which the earth isnt destroyed(at least at that point)) He went flying with her. Made love in the clouds, that sort of thing. He did have a kid with Trillian. But you she only comes into the story in the last book.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
Shadow of an Illusion Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 3:27 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
ice_illusion whapcapn Erix Griffon Nebelstern Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. Now wasn't THAT a good film? sweatdrop No. It really wasn't. It was a massacre. I was prepared for the fact that lots of the most classic dialogue yet written would have to go. But I don't think they can square cutting out quite as much as they did with the vast tracks of new, pointless, nonsensical unfunny material they added. The casting was nigh on perfect, I'll give them that. But they utterly changed the entire focus of the film. As a film in its own right, it wasn't bad. As an adaptation of the book, it was terrible. Adding a love story was nothing short of standing there with a big pot of Hollywood Paint and a large brush, and just slopping it over everything. You can't really complain about the changing of the plot. After al, remember that the books, the TV series, radio series, game and bath towel are all deeply contradictory to one another. It's very likely that the changes to the plot were actually planned by Douglas Adams. However, I haven't seen the film yet and so I won't comment on the quality of it... I have a book.In the foreword he said that that version was the one he choose as to have the "real" plot. It had love in it. I think that was the 4th book. But I havent seen the film so I dont know whether its the right girl. Ive forgotten the name of his true love but she game from earth(alternative dimension, one in which the earth isnt destroyed(at least at that point)) He went flying with her. Made love in the clouds, that sort of thing. He did have a kid with Trillian. But you she only comes into the story in the last book.[/quote That's the fourth book, So Long And Thanks For All The Fish. Girl was Fenchurch (conceived in the ticket queue int Fenchurch station). And yes they made love in the clouds. And Trillian did have his kid in Mostly Harmless, but that was only from a sperm bank. (Arthur donated sperm to help pay travel fees.)
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 4:00 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
whapcapn You can't really complain about the changing of the plot. After al, remember that the books, the TV series, radio series, game and bath towel are all deeply contradictory to one another. It's very likely that the changes to the plot were actually planned by Douglas Adams. However, I haven't seen the film yet and so I won't comment on the quality of it...
I can, and will.
Yes, undoubtedly there were changes made that Adams agreed with. But remember that the film's production had been delayed for years while the production team and Adams argued. Then when he died, the film production started firing on all cylinders.
There were changes made for TV and so on, but none of them were this dramatic, and none of them changed the overal character and point of the story quite as much. See the film, you'll know what I mean.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 5:44 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 7:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|