Welcome to Gaia! ::

This coming from the guy that said CED is balanced without Yata or Sanagn? Laughable.

Because we all know that using DAD in an example to show that Grepher is broken without DAD is the best way to do it, right?

I said Grepher is not broken without DAD. I also said that DAD is broken even without Grepher. Pay attention.

and yah....CED is balanced without Sangan and/or Yata, thanks to the current Metagame...CED is receiving more maindeck/sidedeck(idk about sidedeck) time...

Last time I checked, you're the one to have been proven to have reading problems time and time again.

Obviously not. Lets go over this, shall we?

You said that I claimed CED was balanced, when never mentioned by myself that it was balanced. When brought up, I claimed it was not balanced. You seemed to have passed over that.

When bringing up the effect, you corrected me by adding on "and the most impressive burn damage to date". That part doesn't deserve a correction, or a notice, and as I have been saying, is laughable that you believe it to be.

Also seems that you blatantly disregard all of the comments I have made regarding DaD and what support is ran for it, such as Grepher being better than Armageddon Knight. You obviously ignored my claim that it was proven better by today's meta, and decided to go straight into calling me bad, yet again, by saying I claimed CED as balanced. Which, in quote in my previous statement, I did not.

I've read every argument you made. Made a counterpoint for every single one. It is you, that seems to be unable to do the same in return. You can only make crappy remarks on my "inability to read", and claiming that CED is balanced. Both of which through this entire debate I have not yet done.

Learn to argue. Learn to play. Your petty remarks only show how horrible your arguments are. You're bad at this game. You can continue arguing with me if you want, but it's quite obvious here that this debate isn't in your favor. Good day. Good bye.

Read my full statements. I bolded it this time for you, in case your eyesight needs help. I remember fully, and as I just provided for you I can read fully well. Once again, petty remarks get you nowhere. Or need I quote you again:

quote="Matt Blue"]Gorz is one card I hoped would never come over here.

he's just too... Broken.

You're terrible at this game. Deal with it. Good day.

As a single card, it is not. It gives both players even advantage without the support of Yata Garasu. That's obviously not broken. Closer to balanced, but not quite. Of course, you probably wouldn't be able to tell me that. There's always the burn damage, right? rolleyes

Obviously you don't know much about this game to understand that concept, that the clear advantage of CED is another card. As is Grepher's advantage being Dark Armed Dragon to use the spoils of what was sent away in a single turn to take a field.

You also don't seem to know what's been going on in the meta. DaD, I will say works without Grepher or Malicious. To any playable amount? No. Not at all. I've dueled that version, and the Dimension Fusion build, and the TeleDaD build enough to know what I'm talking about. DaD went down next to nothing but s**t without Dimension Fusion, Dark Grepher, and Malicious. But you wouldn't be able to make these points, seeing as how Armageddon Knight is better than Dark Grepher. Bull. s**t. You're just one of the many who look at a single card to be great, when really it's the support that does the work and does the playing, and does everything that is, in this game, "broken".

Once again, petty remarks. You're obviously bad at this game.

Matt Blue

Gorz is one card I hoped would never come over here.

he's just too... Broken.

People like you, I laugh at for their stupidity and ignorance. I think I'll quote this in my signature, for a good laugh whenever I post.

Oh, so you're a Pojo. That explains everything.

Good day, noob.