TeaDidikai
Rajani Kali? It seems like the explanation is that Pagan = Polytheistic and that is why the other two traditions are excluded. Is this a correct understanding of the point behind the post?
I've always discluded (sorry, new word...) them from the pagan umbrella because they are major, world religions. There are some traditions within the religions that are more folk based that give them a more "pagan" feel, but generally they don't really fall under the classical view of what makes a (Western) pagan religion. The same goes for religions like Taoism and (though I'm less certain here) Shinto. But East Asian religions have always seemed to me to have a very different idea of what constitutes a religion than Abrahamic or Western religions. I can't quite put my finger on it at the moment.
So basically, no, I'm not saying that pagan = polytheistic, as there are many other things that make a pagan religion what it is. But I'm not aware of any monotheistic religions that are considered pagan (though I could be wrong here), which was part of why I was saying that others don't consider Hinduism or Buddhism pagan... "part of" being key here.
Sorry if I'm not making a ton of sense, it's 5 AM here, but I wanted to get this down before I forgot what I was going to say!