|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:17 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
[Kudzu] Dulliath PirateEire So Gardner did not give his 8 holidays names at all? Then, perhaps, in keeping with tradition, lineaged Wiccans should let them remain nameless. I wondered at the start of this thread of the holiday names might be oathbound, but since nobody seemed to respond to that, I just assumed that they weren't. Why would you assume that an oathbound, mystery religion would include any public information, much less be composed of ONLY public information? Sorry, I guess I didn't say that very well. I know that much of the information regarding Wicca is oathbound. That is why in my first post on this thread I asked if the holiday names were oathbound.
Dulliath TeaDidikai Now- the holidays. Gardner himself did not title them by the Major 8 seen in the neo-pagan movement. While I would concede that the dates themselves are valid, can we call the names valid? Before we throw out the names for the holidays, let me point out this - while I would agree that no one outside of actual Wicca can "evolve" the religion, I have heard good arguments for Wiccans inside making minor changes, such as naming the holidays. We have some Wiccans and ex-Wiccans here. I think if they agree that the names are/were what are/were used in the lineaged Trads they are/were in, that they should be accepted as valid. Edit: If they aren't the same, we should use whatever names are in use now for Wiccan holidays, unless, of course, that is oathbound info. ((Are/were I PC enough? AAaack!!))
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:08 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Brill Wavedancer TeaDidikai Now- the holidays. Gardner himself did not title them by the Major 8 seen in the neo-pagan movement. While I would concede that the dates themselves are valid, can we call the names valid? Wait? He didn't? neutral But but but...: Gerald B. Gardner in Witchcraft today It is I think, fairly well known that witches observed four great festivals: May eve, August eve, November eve (Hallowe'en) and Februari eve. These seem to correspond to the divisions of the gaelic year by the four fire festivals of Samhaim or Samhuin (november 1), Brigid (februari 1), Bealteine or Beltene (may 1), and Lughnasadh (august 1). [spelling mistakes are my own as I copied it from the book.] confused question Okay, he didn't label the witches festivals themself, but he did see a link. (However legid that link might be coming from a man listening to Murrey.) I wonder how it came to be that wicca started using these terms for the festivals.
I think the ecclectics use the terms because they sound more Pagany. Just a thought, and I am not willing to prove it by asking every *coughfluffycough*.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:47 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:25 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Henry Dorsett Case Actually, the frilly stuff under a mushroom's cap is referred to as gills. It's a proper mycological term, no less. eek Tea's statement suddenly makes sense. *hits herself on the head.
Henry Dorsett Case From what I've heard, Janet Farrar identified the Halloween-time Sabbat as "Samhain" in Eight Sabbats for Witches. This is where we wind up with interesting conflicts of authority - while she is a rather good authority on Wicca, being the widow of the man who assisted Alexander Sanders in the founding of his Tradition, she's a rather poor authority (from what I can tell) on Celtic religion and culture. From what I've been able to gather from people who actually spend time trying to find sources to back up fluffdom, Eight Sabbats seems to be the work referenced by a good chunk of them. It really seems like Eight Sabbats is the quintessential IRAB resource, since it seems to have just enough information to allow the reader to think they know something. Janet... eek Well, she does live in Ireland. Maybe she felled she had the right to claim the name? xd *hits herself on the head again. gonk
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:09 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Henry Dorsett Case Brill Wavedancer eek Tea's statement suddenly makes sense. *hits herself on the head. Don't hit yourself too hard, or else the fluffies might start making sense, too. So will the little purple men in your sugar bowl. wink
Wait, you mean they dont make sense now? "Ponders burning the notes on life that was given to him"
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|