|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:49 am
|
|
|
|
reagun ban You are stating that you are Wiccan. You are stating that you do not need to be initiated to be Wiccan. I was initiated. Therefore you are stating that I was initiated without need. Tell me where that train of logic breaks down please. I'm not saying that initiation is unneccesary. I'm saying that initiation by a coven was unneccesary for me. I was initiated, you're just chosing to ignore that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:56 pm
|
|
|
|
Neko_Bast ^-^ well reagun ban, I have found an article that agrees with me. I can evan prove that the auther is from a Lineaged coven. and here is the poof.
I'll point out a couple things here:
Quote: We define Wicca as "an Initiatory, Oathbound, Magick-using, Pagan Mystery Priesthood celebrating the Mysteries contained in the Legend of the Descent of the Goddess and in the Charge of the Goddess."
[Cite]
So, in essence, they disagree with you.
From your Article:
Quote: Self initiation, likewise, is also a gift of the Gods. In the case of self initiation, there is no priest or priestess overseeing the rite. There is also no circle, grove or lodge maintaining and nurturing the current of its Mystery tradition. The solitary practitioner isn't excluded from the Mysteries, though, he merely has to work harder to attain them. Note at no where does it say WICCAN mysteries.
Also, you have yet to prove the Mysteries that have been given to you are the WICCAN mysteries.
I'll point out another key part of the article:
Quote: You can't initiate yourself a Gardnerian or Starkindler Wiccan any more than you can anoint yourself Pope or Patriarch. But an initiate is no less an initiate for not being branded with a particular tradition.
In short- your citation supports our position. You're an initiate into a pagan religion. It's just not Wicca.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai I'll point out a couple things here: Quote: We define Wicca as "an Initiatory, Oathbound, Magick-using, Pagan Mystery Priesthood celebrating the Mysteries contained in the Legend of the Descent of the Goddess and in the Charge of the Goddess." [ Cite] So, in essence, they disagree with you. How....explane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:54 pm
|
|
|
|
Neko_Bast TeaDidikai I'll point out a couple things here: Quote: We define Wicca as "an Initiatory, Oathbound, Magick-using, Pagan Mystery Priesthood celebrating the Mysteries contained in the Legend of the Descent of the Goddess and in the Charge of the Goddess." [ Cite] So, in essence, they disagree with you. How....explane.
1) Wicca = Initiatory (as into the religion) Therefore, you're not Wiccan as you haven't been initiated into Wicca.
2) You have not recieved the Oathbound Material
3) Mystery: You have not shown you are aware of the Wiccan Mysteries.
The individual you cited belongs to a tradition that says you are a liar, furthermore- his article never says you are Wiccan, it says you are Pagan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:06 pm
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai Neko_Bast TeaDidikai I'll point out a couple things here: Quote: We define Wicca as "an Initiatory, Oathbound, Magick-using, Pagan Mystery Priesthood celebrating the Mysteries contained in the Legend of the Descent of the Goddess and in the Charge of the Goddess." [ Cite] So, in essence, they disagree with you. How....explane. 1) Wicca = Initiatory (as into the religion) Therefore, you're not Wiccan as you haven't been initiated into Wicca. 2) You have not recieved the Oathbound Material 3) Mystery: You have not shown you are aware of the Wiccan Mysteries. The individual you cited belongs to a tradition that says you are a liar, furthermore- his article never says you are Wiccan, it says you are Pagan.
Untill I get a reply form him on clarifying his article i'm not going to comment. You will never think I'm Wiccan without proof that you can understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|