|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:40 pm
|
|
|
|
Chibbidy Soviet Mudkipz Rellik San Soviet Mudkipz Rellik San I thought it was an international brand? is it like victoria's secret Yep, but with more latex and phallus's. ^^ oh..then it's spencer's I think it's a little more 'mature' than spencers gifts. haha .....site please
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:01 pm
|
|
|
|
I think people are getting a bit off topic here... time for me to do the shooting down you so eloquently bash about...
1. the subject is teen pregnancy, not premarital sex and kids out of wedlock
What about divorce? 75% of canadians have a divorce, and it effects the kids just as much, if not more as having parents not married, and teens are getting married and not ALL religions and people believe in marraige and wish to throw their life away (to a man who will more than likely beat them and steal all their money and belongings.) As for b*****d, theyll be called it anyways, do you know how many people throw that term around carelessly? chances are they will be called a b*****d if male regardless of married parents.
2. Birth control
I dont think you ignoramuses realize this, but no birth control is 100% effective, and therefore things happen. It does not make someone irresponsible for getting pregnant in their teen years.
3. Times change
Sure back when we were a predominantly christian and jewish religion based society, marraige started, this was only to keep track of people for the government; make it easier for taxes and such. But for Judiasm it was to keep track of family to prevent inbred children. Then back in the pioneer ages, it was people 14 years old who started bearing children, it was fine for the times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:24 pm
|
|
|
|
shadow_kitten2006 I think people are getting a bit off topic here... time for me to do the shooting down you so eloquently bash about... 1. the subject is teen pregnancy, not premarital sex and kids out of wedlock What about divorce? 75% of canadians have a divorce, and it effects the kids just as much, if not more as having parents not married, and teens are getting married and not ALL religions and people believe in marraige and wish to throw their life away (to a man who will more than likely beat them and steal all their money and belongings.) As for b*****d, theyll be called it anyways, do you know how many people throw that term around carelessly? chances are they will be called a b*****d if male regardless of married parents. 2. Birth control I dont think you ignoramuses realize this, but no birth control is 100% effective, and therefore things happen. It does not make someone irresponsible for getting pregnant in their teen years. 3. Times change Sure back when we were a predominantly christian and jewish religion based society, marraige started, this was only to keep track of people for the government; make it easier for taxes and such. But for Judiasm it was to keep track of family to prevent inbred children. Then back in the pioneer ages, it was people 14 years old who started bearing children, it was fine for the times.
1. Teen sex does have to do with premarital sex and kids out of wedlock...its not off topic. 2. We never said birth control is 100% but its a hella lot better than not. Obviously it helps to prevent pregnancy or they wouldnt have it out on the market. 3. What are you talking about? The US is still a Christian based society. Have you not taken political science? (Probably not old enough) It was ok to bare (not as in RAWR bear) children at 14 back in pioneer days because the life expectancy back then was in the 30s which today Im going to guess and say 80s? 4. Your made up word in #2 was highly lame. 5. Your arguements are lame as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:41 pm
|
|
|
|
eri x core shadow_kitten2006 I think people are getting a bit off topic here... time for me to do the shooting down you so eloquently bash about... 1. the subject is teen pregnancy, not premarital sex and kids out of wedlock What about divorce? 75% of canadians have a divorce, and it effects the kids just as much, if not more as having parents not married, and teens are getting married and not ALL religions and people believe in marraige and wish to throw their life away (to a man who will more than likely beat them and steal all their money and belongings.) As for b*****d, theyll be called it anyways, do you know how many people throw that term around carelessly? chances are they will be called a b*****d if male regardless of married parents. 2. Birth control I dont think you ignoramuses realize this, but no birth control is 100% effective, and therefore things happen. It does not make someone irresponsible for getting pregnant in their teen years. 3. Times change Sure back when we were a predominantly christian and jewish religion based society, marraige started, this was only to keep track of people for the government; make it easier for taxes and such. But for Judiasm it was to keep track of family to prevent inbred children. Then back in the pioneer ages, it was people 14 years old who started bearing children, it was fine for the times. 1. Teen sex does have to do with premarital sex and kids out of wedlock...its not off topic. 2. We never said birth control is 100% but its a hella lot better than not. Obviously it helps to prevent pregnancy or they wouldnt have it out on the market. 3. What are you talking about? The US is still a Christian based society. Have you not taken political science? (Probably not old enough) It was ok to bare (not as in RAWR bear) children at 14 back in pioneer days because the life expectancy back then was in the 30s which today Im going to guess and say 80s? 4. Your made up word in #2 was highly lame. 5. Your arguements are lame as well. what erin said and to add to her #2 it is their responsibility, it's their choice to fool around and they also made the choice to accept the consequences (mostly the girl). and number 3....marriage had nothing to do with government, or taxes taxing didn't really come around till the middle ages, ever heard of the domesday book? and there was a time before taxes, what about then? peopel still got married
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:03 am
|
|
|
|
Soviet Mudkipz eri x core shadow_kitten2006 I think people are getting a bit off topic here... time for me to do the shooting down you so eloquently bash about... 1. the subject is teen pregnancy, not premarital sex and kids out of wedlock What about divorce? 75% of canadians have a divorce, and it effects the kids just as much, if not more as having parents not married, and teens are getting married and not ALL religions and people believe in marraige and wish to throw their life away (to a man who will more than likely beat them and steal all their money and belongings.) As for b*****d, theyll be called it anyways, do you know how many people throw that term around carelessly? chances are they will be called a b*****d if male regardless of married parents. 2. Birth control I dont think you ignoramuses realize this, but no birth control is 100% effective, and therefore things happen. It does not make someone irresponsible for getting pregnant in their teen years. 3. Times change Sure back when we were a predominantly christian and jewish religion based society, marraige started, this was only to keep track of people for the government; make it easier for taxes and such. But for Judiasm it was to keep track of family to prevent inbred children. Then back in the pioneer ages, it was people 14 years old who started bearing children, it was fine for the times. 1. Teen sex does have to do with premarital sex and kids out of wedlock...its not off topic. 2. We never said birth control is 100% but its a hella lot better than not. Obviously it helps to prevent pregnancy or they wouldnt have it out on the market. 3. What are you talking about? The US is still a Christian based society. Have you not taken political science? (Probably not old enough) It was ok to bare (not as in RAWR bear) children at 14 back in pioneer days because the life expectancy back then was in the 30s which today Im going to guess and say 80s? 4. Your made up word in #2 was highly lame. 5. Your arguements are lame as well. what erin said and to add to her #2 it is their responsibility, it's their choice to fool around and they also made the choice to accept the consequences (mostly the girl). and number 3....marriage had nothing to do with government, or taxes taxing didn't really come around till the middle ages, ever heard of the domesday book? and there was a time before taxes, what about then? peopel still got married Yeah, marraige was mostly for what it really is. A bonding between two people and pretty much any point of time where humans are smart enough to be civilized it was involved with religion....not government. The mayan government could care less if you are having a child, they have a budding civilization to run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:54 pm
|
|
|
|
eri x core shadow_kitten2006 I think people are getting a bit off topic here... time for me to do the shooting down you so eloquently bash about... 1. the subject is teen pregnancy, not premarital sex and kids out of wedlock What about divorce? 75% of canadians have a divorce, and it effects the kids just as much, if not more as having parents not married, and teens are getting married and not ALL religions and people believe in marraige and wish to throw their life away (to a man who will more than likely beat them and steal all their money and belongings.) As for b*****d, theyll be called it anyways, do you know how many people throw that term around carelessly? chances are they will be called a b*****d if male regardless of married parents. 2. Birth control I dont think you ignoramuses realize this, but no birth control is 100% effective, and therefore things happen. It does not make someone irresponsible for getting pregnant in their teen years. 3. Times change Sure back when we were a predominantly christian and jewish religion based society, marraige started, this was only to keep track of people for the government; make it easier for taxes and such. But for Judiasm it was to keep track of family to prevent inbred children. Then back in the pioneer ages, it was people 14 years old who started bearing children, it was fine for the times. 1. Teen sex does have to do with premarital sex and kids out of wedlock...its not off topic. 2. We never said birth control is 100% but its a hella lot better than not. Obviously it helps to prevent pregnancy or they wouldnt have it out on the market. 3. What are you talking about? The US is still a Christian based society. Have you not taken political science? (Probably not old enough) It was ok to bare (not as in RAWR bear) children at 14 back in pioneer days because the life expectancy back then was in the 30s which today Im going to guess and say 80s? 4. Your made up word in #2 was highly lame. 5. Your arguements are lame as well.
1. teens can get married, and do so that is irrelevent 2. someone can take birth control and get pregnant, so whether somone is taking it or not, it is irrelevant 3. I am not from the US so quit jumpin to conclusions, and I ment when it first became a christian based society, but i figured that to be obvious seeing as the whole 'times change' thing. and my school does not offer political science, therefore it is not my fault for my ignorance, seeing as such a course is unavailable. I do not believe my age has anything to do with this subject, but i am in the 12th grade. 4. ignoramus... it is a real word in a thing called a dictionary, and it is perfect you mentioned that, seeing as it refers to an ignorant person. http://www.answers.com/ignoramus&r=67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:55 pm
|
|
|
|
Egima It's called a condum. Use one. Don't and you'll regret it. for sure i might add... Or abortion. Just punch your self in the stomach real hard like.
A baby grows in the womb just so you know, and it is not called a condum, it is a condom. if murder is a legal option, why not, condoms are not 100 percent effective and people get pregnant even by using them. learn what you are talking about before putting your two cents in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
eri x core I'm pretty open minded when it comes to certain topics. This topic though, I have to be a little closed minded. Rellik is right when he says you shouldnt tie yourself down so early. It depends on what age you are. Having children out of wedlock is not good. What does that teach your children? In high school and college you need to focus on school, enjoying your freedoms and taking full advantage of all the things you couldnt do as a child and the things you wont be able to do anymore when you get married and have a family. I hate to say it but its thowing away alot of opportunities. Kids=not being able to travel much...nor party. I had friends who had kids when they were teenagers (not close friends) and they all love thier kids but they regret the time they had them.
Not all teens party, and you can still travel with a child.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Soviet Mudkipz since everyone else is givin' ya the low down i will do it simply like that this guild: open-minded and wiling to listen to your part but we're stubborn in our ideas and opinions, and they're hard to change even though it seems like we gang up on people, we kind of do, but we'll still gang up on each other. and don't be scared, we don't normally give people flak unless it's over the top stupid. or break the rules cause we're tired of that happening. anyways, a great friend of mine is pregnant and she says it's hard and wish it didn't happen. but when you do risj yourself getting pregnant out of marriage, thing of the kid. do you want it to be called a b*****d all the time? do you know the looks he'll get from people knowing it was out of wedlock? its' really not worth it an hour's pleasure is a lifetime worth of regret
yeah... um that hours pleasure at my mothers wedding is her life time of regret...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:07 pm
|
|
|
|
XXX Zombie Porn Rellik San If you want to throw your life away to raise children instead of pursuing a career then be my guest. My view is early to late 20's is career time and if you want kids late 20's early 30's is the best time. Im not having kids at 30+ that's OLD. I don't even want a career so what. I find it funny how America's so marriage out of wedlock is terrible when in the UK there are less and less marriages.
3nodding canada is the same way then. marraige is actually a bad subject for me anyways, my parents are divorced, and my boyfriends, and i have never seen it work out right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|