Chess board idea | Page 2 | Painting and Modelling Discussion | Guild Forums

[.Psycho.Doughboy.]

Offline

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:46 am

Hmm, a Necron take?

King- C'Tan (either one, but I prefer nightbringer.)
Queen- Destroyer lord (mobility and power)
Knights- Flayed Ones (Speedy)
Bishops-Immortals (the most favored servants)
Rooks- Wraiths (Rushing forward)
Pawns- Warriors or Pariahs

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:13 am

I don't think named characters, thus C'tan, should be taken.

Lord and Destroyer Lord for King and Queen respectively,
Knights as Flayed ones or Wraiths, because they are speedy and/or can phase.
Bishops should be Pariahs, I think, because they just have the look that works with it.
Then there's Immortals that should be Rooks, because they looks a lot more solid in comparision.
Pawns should never be an Elite Choice, so basic Warriors will do for that choice.

-Mykal

A.R.G.U.S Mykal

Offline

[.Psycho.Doughboy.]

Offline

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:10 pm

A.R.G.U.S Mykal

I don't think named characters, thus C'tan, should be taken.

Lord and Destroyer Lord for King and Queen respectively,
Knights as Flayed ones or Wraiths, because they are speedy and/or can phase.
Bishops should be Pariahs, I think, because they just have the look that works with it.
Then there's Immortals that should be Rooks, because they looks a lot more solid in comparision.
Pawns should never be an Elite Choice, so basic Warriors will do for that choice.

-Mykal

either/or xd

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:59 am

Eldar could be done so many ways, with it's aspect warriors...

Pawns: Guardians.
Rooks: Wraithguard.
Knights: Swooping Hawkes
Bishops: Warlocks
King: Farseer
Queen: Autarch

DarkElf27
Captain

Familiar Guildsman

11,250 Points

100
400
200

Offline

Mutant Platypus

Offline

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:04 am

Now i'm not sure how well this would work, but tell what you think:

King: Broodlord
Queen: Tyrant
Rooks: Zoanthropes(i'd say fex, but he probably wouldn't fit well on a chess board)
Knights: Raveners/Gargoyles
Bishops: Warriors
Pawns: Termagaunts

the monsterous creatures might prove a problem, but if its a custom made chess board there shouldn't be too much difficulty.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:23 am

bluegoldfish42

Now i'm not sure how well this would work, but tell what you think:

King: Broodlord
Queen: Tyrant
Rooks: Zoanthropes(i'd say fex, but he probably wouldn't fit well on a chess board)
Knights: Raveners/Gargoyles
Bishops: Warriors
Pawns: Termagaunts

the monsterous creatures might prove a problem, but if its a custom made chess board there shouldn't be too much difficulty.

I feel like it should be more like

King: Broodlord
Queen: zoanthrope (Hive tyrant would not fit)
Rooks: tyrant guard, I belive they have that tough strong feel
Knights: Gargoyles or winged warriors
Bishops: Warriors or genestealers
Pawns: homagaunts or teramgants (or spinegaunts)

and the inquistion/ impearial guard

King: inquisitor/commander
Queen: caoness
Rooks: heavy weapon team or vindicare assasin (HW team may not fit) or relic bearer
Knights: sepharim
Bishops: assasin or commisar
Pawns: sisters of battle/guardsmen/greyknights

drigler

Offline

Welcome to Gaia! ::

Gaia Guilds

The Official Warhammer 40,000 and Tabletop Gaming Guild

Quick Reply

More Information