|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:38 am
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai cerridwen_uk TeaDidikai So... in short- it's not the publisher, but the authors one should avoid. Pretty much, it's just unfortunate that for the most part Lewellyn seem to condone Fluffy Bunnyness lol
I wonder how'd they feel if bunnies looked like this?
Blessings
Cerri xI think condone is an inaccurate assertion. They profit from them. Furthermore- they provide accessable paganism. Most of the content isn't invalid until it begins to use terms they have no right to use.
Well, that's true, condone was the wrong word...lol It was late biggrin it was the first word that came to mind. And yes, they do profit from it. I mean there are some good books out there, if you can find them. It's just unfortunate that you end up parting with cash inorder to find out which is which.
Cerri x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:55 pm
|
|
|
|
phoenix_shadowwolf TeaDidikai phoenix_shadowwolf not to mention some of the old 'classics' that are pretty good to have for your average occultist: three books of occult philosophy, john dee's diaries. i can't remember too much else right now though. They still have the publishing rights to Agrippa's works? confused last time i saw the book was probably 3 months ago, so i'd say yeah. Huh. I could have sworn Wiser had picked them up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:03 pm
|
|
|
|
Ahem:
Quote: Llewiccan RedeCode 1. All paths are valid, except the ones that have rules. 2. Wiccans never use curses, except on really mean people who totally deserve it. 3. The Threefold Law affects everyone, whether they believe in it or not; however, this is not to be taken to mean that Hell will affect everyone whether they believe in it or not. 4. The most important thing for Witches in the public eye to do is to disavow any connection with Satanism. 5. Karma can be summoned, directed, intensified, or averted entirely by saying the right words at the end of your spells. Except by mean people, who can't do any of these things. 6. Sex and Blood are the forbidden topics. 7. No religion, sect, lineage or coven is allowed to restrict its membership in a way that might be considered discriminatory. But they don't have to allow Satanists. 8. All magickal groups are called "covens." 9. Initiation is a formal ceremony, like a graduation. All it means is that you're officially recognized by a group. 10. All Mysteries are available to everyone. Drugs or certain physical conditions are never necessary. 11. Everyone's experiences and opinions are equally valid, equally correct in all ways. Except the Satanists, who are Christians in denial. 12. The experience, skill and wisdom of a witch is measured by how many books she has read. Writing a book on Wicca (or a related topic) puts one ahead of any amount of reading or practical in-circle experience. 13. You may be as mean as you want to anyone who violates the code... it's their Karma. Additional Bonus rule; insert after any one or three of the rules above: Never again the Burning Times!!!! (Kopyleft 2004. All rights reversed; reprint what you like.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:56 pm
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai phoenix_shadowwolf TeaDidikai phoenix_shadowwolf not to mention some of the old 'classics' that are pretty good to have for your average occultist: three books of occult philosophy, john dee's diaries. i can't remember too much else right now though. They still have the publishing rights to Agrippa's works? confused last time i saw the book was probably 3 months ago, so i'd say yeah. Huh. I could have sworn Wiser had picked them up. Agrippa's public domain. I could publish him out of my bedroom if I wanted to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:26 am
|
|
|
|
Nuri Ahem: Quote: wonderfully insightful discord (Kopyleft 2004. All rights reversed; reprint what you like.)
Wonderful rofl Personally I'd be of the opinion that all books have SOMETHING in them that's useful, not every book would be perfect at first draft and I get the impression that a lot of the time new-age publishers accept books before they've been properly refined. Even then there is a few occasional grains of gold or silver, even if it's only a paragraph here or there or a single insightful point jumping out of a chapter of static.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|