Sig Art: What is Offensive , What's not

[Tidus Guado]

I've got balls of steel

There was someone's sig that was a .GIF of freddy kruger stabbing some lady through her face from behind. :/
Reported it for it being oversize and how graphic it was. /d**k

Your sig is EXTREMELY suggestive/blatantly having two guys butt ******** without seeing penetration.  

[Voievoda]

Wouldn't bother me.
But I'm (mostly) de-sensitized. To this day, this is the most bestest sig ever: X
But there is alot of people that would be offended.  

[Eudaemon]

I was a former mod and I probably would have warned you for that because this site is PG-13 and depictions of sexual acts are a big no-no, even if they are clothed. It is similar to avi art of one avi putting their hands down another avi's pants (something I encountered).

It's way too obvious what they are doing...  

[Dickie Twinkles]

I don't see how it's really worse than that one ad they used to run which used a cut off bit of the himmlich manoevre from the manga to look like rape.
I made an SF thread about that image and got a warning for "trolling" scream  

[I Poetic Justice I]

Dickie Twinkles

I don't see how it's really worse than that one ad they used to run which used a cut off bit of the himmlich manoevre from the manga to look like rape.
I made an SF thread about that image and got a warning for "trolling" scream

I remember that lol

But yeah it is suggestive i don't want to get reported over something so silly.  

[ghgvjj]

Voievoda

Wouldn't bother me.
But I'm (mostly) de-sensitized. To this day, this is the most bestest sig ever: X
But there is alot of people that would be offended.

Was that one ever reported? Because it was just too good.