|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:52 pm
Most people think that homo/bi/les/gay is sick, the people that are gay aren't necessarily "sick" in my oponion and I don't even think there is anything wrong with being gay or the ppl that are.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:55 pm
itainandatebayo well...if that insulted you as a bi then that's just your problem and i dont really care...why can't i say that i dont like em if i don't... Ok, fine. You get your own opinions. So I can say, 'You have purple in your avi! You suck!', and everything's still all fine and dandy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:05 pm
The Tsaria itainandatebayo well...if that insulted you as a bi then that's just your problem and i dont really care...why can't i say that i dont like em if i don't... Ok, fine. You get your own opinions. So I can say, 'You have purple in your avi! You suck!', and everything's still all fine and dandy. do i look like i care? you really think that im going to be all upset just like you becouse you try to insult me and fail in doing that? why dont you give me a real insult next time ^^ and...since when do gay people admit that wearing a certain color makes you gay?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:09 pm
If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose.
However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS.
Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either:
A) A choice
B) A dysfunction
"Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:22 pm
Amensu Saje Honestly, I'm against it. Yes, they're fun to be around, and they're usually really funny. But the idea [from the beginning] was for people to date.marry people of the opposite gender. If homosexual people are going against this(I'm assuming you're taking a religious view, don't get pissed at me if I'm wrong) then why would anyone be created to do something other than what we're intended? If 'God' intended for heterosexual couples why would he mix in homosexual couples if it's not what was intended? Honestly, the only reason it should matter 'what's indented' and what's not, is reproduction, and the human population is not lacking in numbers in any way, shape, or form. So, there's no reason why homosexual couples go against what's intended if there's no damage what-so-ever being done. Also, Your 'the idea from the beginning' think, well, all great ideas change or are altered, heterosexual to homosexual is just one of those chances, that's the way I see it. Why be against taking away happiness when it does no damage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:24 pm
itainandatebayo i hate them...they should go back to the closet and never come out again.. Ignorance is bliss, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Elektro7 If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose. However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS. Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either: A) A choice B) A dysfunction "Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming. Trust me, it's better if you don't even mention the natural purpose thing. We do a lot of things, as humans, that have no natural purpose. It's way better if you say: they were born that way. Because usually a lot of people will agree with that. E Especially little monsters. 4laugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:30 pm
Elektro7 If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose. However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS. Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either: A) A choice B) A dysfunction "Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming. 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:34 pm
Diseased Hooker Elektro7 If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose. However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS. Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either: A) A choice B) A dysfunction "Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming. 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes To just include some homosexuality in the post, you are ******** adorable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:41 pm
Diseased Hooker 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes I never claimed that humans don't do things that aren't required for survival. However, people don't claim they do those things because they were born that way. If they do, then it takes us back to the dysfunctional aspect of it all. And none of them even close to having the impact upon an individual that sexuality does. And by that logic, heterosexuality is pointless because there are enough Humans in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:00 pm
Elektro7 Diseased Hooker 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes I never claimed that humans don't do things that aren't required for survival. However, people don't claim they do those things because they were born that way. If they do, then it takes us back to the dysfunctional aspect of it all. And none of them even close to having the impact upon an individual that sexuality does. And by that logic, heterosexuality is pointless because there are enough Humans in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:07 pm
Marokia Diseased Hooker Elektro7 If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose. However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS. Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either: A) A choice B) A dysfunction "Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming. 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes To just include some homosexuality in the post, you are ******** adorable. It got homosexual as soon as I pressed 'Reply'. cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:11 pm
Elektro7 Diseased Hooker 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes I never claimed that humans don't do things that aren't required for survival. However, people don't claim they do those things because they were born that way. If they do, then it takes us back to the dysfunctional aspect of it all. And none of them even close to having the impact upon an individual that sexuality does. And by that logic, heterosexuality is pointless because there are enough Humans in the world. Then why even bring it up if not only homosexual people do it? It's off-topic and hypocritical of you to bring it up. Also, I'm homosexual. I don't think I was born with it, I've liked a girl once. It's developed. And, please do explain why it's 'dusfunctional', I'm extremely interested. Quote: And none of them even close to having the impact upon an individual that sexuality does. Explain that, too. I guess I'm just being dysfunctional again. One last thing, I said homosexuality doesn't have an impact on the human race due to reproduction, small percentages of people won't impact numbers. I never said heterosexual people are pointless. Stop over-thinking these things, it's dysfunctional. smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:12 pm
Diseased Hooker Marokia Diseased Hooker Elektro7 If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose. However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS. Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either: A) A choice B) A dysfunction "Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming. 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes To just include some homosexuality in the post, you are ******** adorable. It got homosexual as soon as I pressed 'Reply'. cool Hehe probably. You do seem to ooze it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:18 pm
Marokia Diseased Hooker Marokia Diseased Hooker Elektro7 If someone is gay, I have no problem with that. People can live their lives however they choose. However the explanation for why they're homosexual I often find to be total BS. Considering that being homosexual has absolutely no natural purpose, it is either: A) A choice B) A dysfunction "Dysfunction" tends to have bad connotations however, I don't intend for it to, but regardless it usually leads to flaming. 'Natural purpose', and I'm guessing you mean reproduction. As I said, the world has enough humans, so gay couples not reproducing in an already over-populated planet is no skin off anyone's back. We're not going to die out because homosexuals don't reproduce. Also, TONS of things humans do has little no no 'natural purpose', it's not just homosexuals. rolleyes To just include some homosexuality in the post, you are ******** adorable. It got homosexual as soon as I pressed 'Reply'. cool Hehe probably. You do seem to ooze it. Probably, I've been 'dysfunctional' for so long, it just seeps out lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
