|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:28 pm
kurousagi35 I went back to the original design, the future fusion is just not for me
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is easily needed at 3, with Red-Eyes Wyvern at no less than 2.
Blue-Eyes White Dragon and White Stone of Legend are not pitched into any deck without the only draw support that makes them even considered play.
Aside from four cards, the rest of the deck is in bad shape, with choices that are either played at the wrong quantity or shouldn't be played at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 5:43 pm
Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 I went back to the original design, the future fusion is just not for me
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is easily needed at 3, with Red-Eyes Wyvern at no less than 2.
Blue-Eyes White Dragon and White Stone of Legend are not pitched into any deck without the only draw support that makes them even considered play.
Aside from four cards, the rest of the deck is in bad shape, with choices that are either played at the wrong quantity or shouldn't be played at all.No future fusion doesn't work for me I have cards that let me put my fusion material monsters in my hand, and future fusion only works if my material monsters are in my deck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 pm
kurousagi35 Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 I went back to the original design, the future fusion is just not for me
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is easily needed at 3, with Red-Eyes Wyvern at no less than 2.
Blue-Eyes White Dragon and White Stone of Legend are not pitched into any deck without the only draw support that makes them even considered play.
Aside from four cards, the rest of the deck is in bad shape, with choices that are either played at the wrong quantity or shouldn't be played at all.No future fusion doesn't work for me I have cards that let me put my fusion material monsters in my hand, and future fusion only works if my material monsters are in my deck.
Your deck doesn't have the idealistic feel of doing what it's supposed to do, it's garbage, and neglecting THE best Spell support this type has just makes it worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:35 pm
Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 I went back to the original design, the future fusion is just not for me
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is easily needed at 3, with Red-Eyes Wyvern at no less than 2.
Blue-Eyes White Dragon and White Stone of Legend are not pitched into any deck without the only draw support that makes them even considered play.
Aside from four cards, the rest of the deck is in bad shape, with choices that are either played at the wrong quantity or shouldn't be played at all.No future fusion doesn't work for me I have cards that let me put my fusion material monsters in my hand, and future fusion only works if my material monsters are in my deck.
Your deck doesn't have the idealistic feel of doing what it's supposed to do, it's garbage, and neglecting THE best Spell support this type has just makes it worse.Can't blieve I'm on the defense for this... I hate dragons... *sigh* what he is saying is that he has the fusion material monsters in hand, although there apparently is any way around this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:38 pm
Terror of the Dead Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 I went back to the original design, the future fusion is just not for me
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is easily needed at 3, with Red-Eyes Wyvern at no less than 2.
Blue-Eyes White Dragon and White Stone of Legend are not pitched into any deck without the only draw support that makes them even considered play.
Aside from four cards, the rest of the deck is in bad shape, with choices that are either played at the wrong quantity or shouldn't be played at all.No future fusion doesn't work for me I have cards that let me put my fusion material monsters in my hand, and future fusion only works if my material monsters are in my deck.
Your deck doesn't have the idealistic feel of doing what it's supposed to do, it's garbage, and neglecting THE best Spell support this type has just makes it worse.Can't blieve I'm on the defense for this... I hate dragons... *sigh* what he is saying is that he has the fusion material monsters in hand, although there apparently is any way around this. exactly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:55 pm
kurousagi35 Terror of the Dead Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 I went back to the original design, the future fusion is just not for me
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is easily needed at 3, with Red-Eyes Wyvern at no less than 2.
Blue-Eyes White Dragon and White Stone of Legend are not pitched into any deck without the only draw support that makes them even considered play.
Aside from four cards, the rest of the deck is in bad shape, with choices that are either played at the wrong quantity or shouldn't be played at all.No future fusion doesn't work for me I have cards that let me put my fusion material monsters in my hand, and future fusion only works if my material monsters are in my deck.
Your deck doesn't have the idealistic feel of doing what it's supposed to do, it's garbage, and neglecting THE best Spell support this type has just makes it worse.Can't blieve I'm on the defense for this... I hate dragons... *sigh* what he is saying is that he has the fusion material monsters in hand, although there apparently is any way around this. exactly
What I'm saying is, your idea is to get the Fusion Material monsters to your hand. You can do so, easier, with Future Fusion. It's easier to get the three Blue-Eyes White Dragon to your hand when you use Future Fusion to send all three copies of White Stone of Legend plus two away, instead of relying on drawing and getting them to the Graveyard in the long run.
What else I'm saying is, as great a card Future Fusion is for Dragons, it's not going to work because his deck is built terribly. It helps when you run cards with actual, beneficial effects, at a higher number than one.
I should just tl;dr and call the deck s**t like I used to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:33 pm
Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 Terror of the Dead Freed the Benevolent kurousagi35 No future fusion doesn't work for me I have cards that let me put my fusion material monsters in my hand, and future fusion only works if my material monsters are in my deck.
Your deck doesn't have the idealistic feel of doing what it's supposed to do, it's garbage, and neglecting THE best Spell support this type has just makes it worse.Can't blieve I'm on the defense for this... I hate dragons... *sigh* what he is saying is that he has the fusion material monsters in hand, although there apparently is any way around this. exactly
What I'm saying is, your idea is to get the Fusion Material monsters to your hand. You can do so, easier, with Future Fusion. It's easier to get the three Blue-Eyes White Dragon to your hand when you use Future Fusion to send all three copies of White Stone of Legend plus two away, instead of relying on drawing and getting them to the Graveyard in the long run.your idea would be good if I actually had a Five Headed Dragon but I don't so can we move on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:41 pm
Then go get it. What else can I tell you? I'm not handing a list just for what you have only, I like to see what actually works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francine These Chocodiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:50 pm
Freed the Benevolent Then go get it. What else can I tell you? I'm not handing a list just for what you have only, I like to see what actually works. Yeah well thanks anyway, anyone else wanna express their opinion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:02 pm
Wow the rumors I heard were right. While Freed has good points he could easily say them nicer. I know nothing of dragons myself but I do realize the potential of Future Fusion in any Fusion deck does make it a staple backbone. How ever if you find that it does work for you, then try another approach. Deck building and critiquing doesn't have to involve harsh words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:32 pm
Col.Beowulf Wow the rumors I heard were right. While Freed has good points he could easily say them nicer. I know nothing of dragons myself but I do realize the potential of Future Fusion in any Fusion deck does make it a staple backbone. How ever if you find that it does work for you, then try another approach. Deck building and critiquing doesn't have to involve harsh words. Thank you, glad someone said it. Its not like I'm bad mouthing future fusion or anything, it just never appealed to me nor is it necessary in this deck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:44 pm
kurousagi35 Col.Beowulf Wow the rumors I heard were right. While Freed has good points he could easily say them nicer. I know nothing of dragons myself but I do realize the potential of Future Fusion in any Fusion deck does make it a staple backbone. How ever if you find that it does work for you, then try another approach. Deck building and critiquing doesn't have to involve harsh words. Thank you, glad someone said it. Its not like I'm bad mouthing future fusion or anything, it just never appealed to me nor is it necessary in this deck. no basically what you're saying is, i'm bad at this game and refuse to get any better instead of getting your head out of your a** and avoid him saying those things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:18 am
Boxxy 110 kurousagi35 Col.Beowulf Wow the rumors I heard were right. While Freed has good points he could easily say them nicer. I know nothing of dragons myself but I do realize the potential of Future Fusion in any Fusion deck does make it a staple backbone. How ever if you find that it does work for you, then try another approach. Deck building and critiquing doesn't have to involve harsh words. Thank you, glad someone said it. Its not like I'm bad mouthing future fusion or anything, it just never appealed to me nor is it necessary in this deck. no basically what you're saying is, i'm bad at this game and refuse to get any better instead of getting your head out of your a** and avoid him saying those things. Wow really? I said that? Cuz I thought I said that, this particular card doesn't work well in this deck but thank you ever so much translating what I said into something completely different I really appreciate that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:13 am
I'm not saying anything about future fusion.
Also, why do people have to be mean to others? Incase your not aware this is a children's card game... not life.
If he doesn't want to use a certain card because he does not have the corrisponding card to go with it, then that's his chose. Not everyone buys off eBay and has easy trading access.
I would say that this deck is a work in progress and needs some suggetions to help it. If he does not want to use or have a persific card then stop being narrow minded and think of alternatives, eg 'Cards of Consonance' or 'Elemental Hero Prisma' with 'Dragons Mirrior'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:00 pm
kurousagi35 Boxxy 110 kurousagi35 Col.Beowulf Wow the rumors I heard were right. While Freed has good points he could easily say them nicer. I know nothing of dragons myself but I do realize the potential of Future Fusion in any Fusion deck does make it a staple backbone. How ever if you find that it does work for you, then try another approach. Deck building and critiquing doesn't have to involve harsh words. Thank you, glad someone said it. Its not like I'm bad mouthing future fusion or anything, it just never appealed to me nor is it necessary in this deck. no basically what you're saying is, i'm bad at this game and refuse to get any better instead of getting your head out of your a** and avoid him saying those things. Wow really? I said that? Cuz I thought I said that, this particular card doesn't work well in this deck but thank you ever so much translating what I said into something completely different I really appreciate that. future fusion does work well in good dragon decks. This deck isn't, it looks like a bunch of cards you picked from your toy box and put together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
