|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:59 am
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai Starlock TeaDidikai Perhaps you should communicate more clearly. I suggest using qualifiers to avoid blanket assertions. Perhaps. Perhaps as well you should avoid assuming a statement is an absolute when it is not written as such? mrgreen However- it is written as such. No alterntives are listed, no qualifiers placed. Am I expected to read your mind or your words?
No, it isn't written as such, you interpreted it as such for whatever reason. It isn't an absolutist statement, but I can see how it can be read that way; it seems in reading you tend to presume a statement is an absolute unless qualified or punctuated with alternatives. Others may not approach things with that assumption. Even better, others might think, 'well, they didn't exactly say this is always the case, nor did they add a qualifier which explicitly stated it wasn't always the case. Since I don't know for sure... hmm... maybe I should ask the poster for clarification before assuming what they meant?' mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:42 am
|
|
|
|
Starlock No, it isn't written as such, you interpreted it as such for whatever reason. It isn't an absolutist statement, but I can see how it can be read that way; it seems in reading you tend to presume a statement is an absolute unless qualified or punctuated with alternatives. Others may not approach things with that assumption. Even better, others might think, 'well, they didn't exactly say this is always the case, nor did they add a qualifier which explicitly stated it wasn't always the case. Since I don't know for sure... hmm... maybe I should ask the poster for clarification before assuming what they meant?' mrgreen Actually, The Writing 101 courses I am familiar with explain that positive assertions are intended to be held as fact and it is the author’s job to support their position and make exceptions.
Granted, I don’t expect people to express themselves flawlessly, but I do expect intellectual honesty and for them to make corrections to clarify their meaning instead of pussyfooting around semantics.
Now- I could have said Writing 101 Courses explain that positive assertions are held as fact and it is the author’s job to support their position or make exceptions, but that wouldn’t be the kind of positive assertions someone who is intending to communicate a clear idea would use.
The posts of yours I object to most use a lot of High School level psychology to justify themselves. The problem with that is that it is a watered down system designed to be an introduction to a complex and ever changing field. For all I know- you honestly believe the fluffy psych you post.
I guess in the future instead of saying “Where was it said that … ?” You could say “Oops. I meant…”. If only for the sake of intellectual honesty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|