|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:32 am
zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz Are you? I see no proof of such a quest. I see no supporting evidence or reasoning. There is no logical foundation or empirical support. While your statement may be true, as it stands it cannot be accepted. After all: zz1000zz At the point in which you make a statement, it is your responsibility to support it, not ours to destruct it. *points to my signature* Good enough for me *points to my hat* Consider your point refuted. Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:33 am
celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz Are you? I see no proof of such a quest. I see no supporting evidence or reasoning. There is no logical foundation or empirical support. While your statement may be true, as it stands it cannot be accepted. After all: zz1000zz At the point in which you make a statement, it is your responsibility to support it, not ours to destruct it. *points to my signature* Good enough for me *points to my hat* Consider your point refuted. Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb! I attempted to consider it, but i could not find a meaning for "rebudle" in the dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:36 am
zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz Are you? I see no proof of such a quest. I see no supporting evidence or reasoning. There is no logical foundation or empirical support. While your statement may be true, as it stands it cannot be accepted. After all: zz1000zz At the point in which you make a statement, it is your responsibility to support it, not ours to destruct it. *points to my signature* Good enough for me *points to my hat* Consider your point refuted. Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb! I attempted to consider it, but i could not find a meaning for "rebudle" in the dictionary. Must have spelt it wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:38 am
celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe *points to my signature* Good enough for me *points to my hat* Consider your point refuted. Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb! I attempted to consider it, but i could not find a meaning for "rebudle" in the dictionary. Must have spelt it wrong Indeed. I know what word you mean, but at the point in which you make me disprove, "The grass is green," i am not going to help you out too much. I mean, why make it harder on myself?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:40 am
Normally i would consider this a rhetorical question, but it does not even have a question mark. So confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:44 am
zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe *points to my signature* Good enough for me *points to my hat* Consider your point refuted. Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb! I attempted to consider it, but i could not find a meaning for "rebudle" in the dictionary. Must have spelt it wrong Indeed. I know what word you mean, but at the point in which you make me disprove, "The grass is green," i am not going to help you out too much. I mean, why make it harder on myself? Because you care about me? My rebuttal is in regards to you pointing to your hat; therefor, granting you the power to refute my previous comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:45 am
zz1000zz Normally i would consider this a rhetorical question, but it does not even have a question mark. So confusing. More of a personal thought
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:46 am
celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb! I attempted to consider it, but i could not find a meaning for "rebudle" in the dictionary. Must have spelt it wrong Indeed. I know what word you mean, but at the point in which you make me disprove, "The grass is green," i am not going to help you out too much. I mean, why make it harder on myself? Because you care about me? My rebuttal is in regards to you pointing to your hat; therefor, granting you the power to refute my previous comment. Rather than argue your rebuttal, i will simply apply it to the comment my refutation was directed towards, to which you then applied this refutation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:47 am
zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe Consider my rebudle: gbgwbegjkwebgjbmejbgrjbgjbwgbjjeejb! I attempted to consider it, but i could not find a meaning for "rebudle" in the dictionary. Must have spelt it wrong Indeed. I know what word you mean, but at the point in which you make me disprove, "The grass is green," i am not going to help you out too much. I mean, why make it harder on myself? Because you care about me? My rebuttal is in regards to you pointing to your hat; therefor, granting you the power to refute my previous comment. Rather than argue your rebuttal, i will simply apply it to the comment my refutation was directed towards, to which you then applied this refutation. I will assume taht means I can sleep now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:47 am
celebie.exe zz1000zz Normally i would consider this a rhetorical question, but it does not even have a question mark. So confusing. More of a personal thought Do you always share your personal thoughts in the same manner as your spoken comments, or is it just for me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:48 am
zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz Normally i would consider this a rhetorical question, but it does not even have a question mark. So confusing. More of a personal thought Do you always share your personal thoughts in the same manner as your spoken comments, or is it just for me? It is just for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:49 am
celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz Indeed. I know what word you mean, but at the point in which you make me disprove, "The grass is green," i am not going to help you out too much. I mean, why make it harder on myself? Because you care about me? My rebuttal is in regards to you pointing to your hat; therefor, granting you the power to refute my previous comment. Rather than argue your rebuttal, i will simply apply it to the comment my refutation was directed towards, to which you then applied this refutation. I will assume taht means I can sleep now. You can sleep whenever you want, but you still have proved nothing. I was simply showing your refutation refuted your own statement. Indeed, it refutes itself if one wishes to be liberal about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:50 am
zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz Indeed. I know what word you mean, but at the point in which you make me disprove, "The grass is green," i am not going to help you out too much. I mean, why make it harder on myself? Because you care about me? My rebuttal is in regards to you pointing to your hat; therefor, granting you the power to refute my previous comment. Rather than argue your rebuttal, i will simply apply it to the comment my refutation was directed towards, to which you then applied this refutation. I will assume taht means I can sleep now. You can sleep whenever you want, but you still have proved nothing. I was simply showing your refutation refuted your own statement. Indeed, it refutes itself if one wishes to be liberal about it. I feel pretty, oh so pretty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:52 am
celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe zz1000zz celebie.exe Because you care about me? My rebuttal is in regards to you pointing to your hat; therefor, granting you the power to refute my previous comment. Rather than argue your rebuttal, i will simply apply it to the comment my refutation was directed towards, to which you then applied this refutation. I will assume taht means I can sleep now. You can sleep whenever you want, but you still have proved nothing. I was simply showing your refutation refuted your own statement. Indeed, it refutes itself if one wishes to be liberal about it. I feel pretty, oh so pretty Be that as it may, you still have made no proofs. Fortunately for you, my internet is on the fritz, and i will probably not be able to continue this "discussion."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
