|
|
| vampires! |
| Woot! |
|
78% |
[ 36 ] |
| :stare: |
|
21% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:28 pm
Ndoki The primary energy form being used inside humans however would be electrons, and those don't really have different forms. Yes there may be a few different types (I was referring to one) but the point still stands that they all have to come from somewhere. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, just transferred from one form to another. The sun is our biggest form of energy, and I can't really think of any other type of energy that doesn't come from it, or at least in such a major way. Would you be able to list these 15 different kinds? I'd be interested to see them. So far off the top of my head I can think of a few... Kinetic energy, either from living creatures using stored energy from food (and in turn the sun) or a moving object, that would have to be set in motion from something, either a creature or a naturally occuring force which again I can only think of having roots with the sun (wind, water, etc.). Mechanical energy is just kinetic energy in a machine. Chemical energy is just another form of stored energy.... well I'm just going to stop there for the night. Indeed, my post has little relevance except that many "vampires" claim to be able to manipulate energy. If that were true, the different forms of energy would be rather important. Mainly i posted that because i am a stickler for fact (and i was in a discussion about the same topic earlier in the day). Anyways, a list of some off the top of my head: Quote: 1) Kinetic 2) Gravitatonal 3) Spring 4) Electrical 5) Magnetic 6) Thermal 7) Fission cool Light 9) Chemical 10) Sound 11) Raidioactive 12) Dark Energy Yeah, yeah. The last one may be a *bit* of a stretch, but so what? The point is that there are many different "types" of energy. It is just that most can be lumped together. As for this "pranic energy," there is no scientific basis for anything regarding it. Kirlian photography is a joke, and personal experience means nothing in a scientific debate. Quite frankly, there is no scientific basis for claims of vampirism.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:24 am
only because science does not accept the metaphysical very readily. it has only recently begun to accept the existance of spirits, and even at that, most scientists still do not believe in spirits, psychics, remote viewing, telekinesis, or anything of the sort. human beings need to realize that there are many, many, many things that exist outside of their understanding, and will likely remain outside of their understanding for many generations. several hundred years ago there was also no scientific basis for the computer, and in fact the first person to even suggest the idea was laughed at and chastised. now, computers are in almost every home, and continuing to grow more and more advanced.
Could similar things not be said for vampirism and therianthropy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:51 pm
the fact that for several days nobody has posted a reply leads me to believe one of two things:
A) my arguments have forced people to think and do research on their own.
B) I've annoyed people by vehemently disagreeing with them.
either way, i believe i've won here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:10 pm
DR490N the fact that for several days nobody has posted a reply leads me to believe one of two things: A) my arguments have forced people to think and do research on their own. B) I've annoyed people by vehemently disagreeing with them. either way, i believe i've won here. Actually, i think it is because people have accepted you are incapable of holding an intelligent debate. A few examples are in order: Quote: only because science does not accept the metaphysical very readily. it has only recently begun to accept the existance of spirits, and even at that, most scientists still do not believe in spirits, psychics, remote viewing, telekinesis, or anything of the sort. Science in no way accepts the existence of the metaphysical. Spirits and telekinisis are in no way accepted by any scientific standard. Truth: Science rejects the metaphysical. Science has no room for religion, nor does it have room for metaphysics. By their very definitions, they are incompatible. Quote: several hundred years ago there was also no scientific basis for the computer, and in fact the first person to even suggest the idea was laughed at and chastised. Actually, there has always been a scientific basis for computers. The first people to suggest them were not "laughed at" as you claim. In fact, this is a baseless claim without any merit. Computers can be made from matchstick boxes and beads if a person so desires, and it is only the modern incarnation of the computer that would seem odd in another time period. Quote: Could similar things not be said for vampirism and therianthropy No. There is no physical evidence for vampirism, therianthropy, telekinisis, psychic ability, telepathy, or even a god. Nor is there any firm logical basis for these. As such, these are in no way similar to computers, or any other science. Believe whatever you want to believe; it makes no difference to me. If you start saying science supports your metaphysical beliefs, i will show you wrong every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:03 pm
fair enough. when i spoke of computers i had meant the modern incarnaton of them, not an abacus or anything simple like that.
also, i never said science supports my beliefs. there are, however, psuedo-sciences which do look into the things i mentioned. the american military admits to the use of remote viewers on several occasions, as do police forces, there is also a science that studies spiritual phonomena, though at the time i cannot readily recall the name of it. now, at this point, there may not be any proven scientific method for studying the effects of vampirism and therianthropy, but I believe that someday there likely will be, as do many others. we simply need someone to develop the proper equipment and experiments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:38 pm
i like vampires. i think there sooo kool. but thats just me.
biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:38 pm
if onyl it were as glamourous as it is in the movies or as easy to deal with life would be alot easier for my kind gonk immortality would be nice too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:15 pm
Well i like to leran more about them,
I myself never had blood but would like to try it.
One of my friends is a vampire, but he is a little on the crazy end. does any know how to weather he is or isnt( and no im not crazy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:54 am
i just like the subject i just like to read abot them and talk about them i dont think that there real or any of that stuff but i like vampires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:47 am
Amon the Halfbreed Well i like to leran more about them, I myself never had blood but would like to try it. One of my friends is a vampire, but he is a little on the crazy end. does any know how to weather he is or isnt( and no im not crazy) Read the first few pages in this thread, but really, it's virtually impossible to create a yes or no answer to anything supernatural, it's an untestable area. But, just imagine if there was something that could actually prove people's claims of being psychic, boy that would an an amusing day for scientists everywhere xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:50 am
DR490N if onyl it were as glamourous as it is in the movies or as easy to deal with life would be alot easier for my kind gonk immortality would be nice too... Don't forget the flying and super strength, it's gotta be fun to be able to just take off into the air, or be able to bench press a truck, no arguing with someone that can crush steel, that's for sure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:42 pm
oooh i'm wqith you on that. it'd also be nice to be able to turn into my therianthrope type too. nothing like a 20 foot long blue dragon flying through the air to get people running.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:15 pm
DR490N oooh i'm wqith you on that. it'd also be nice to be able to turn into my therianthrope type too. nothing like a 20 foot long blue dragon flying through the air to get people running. And get fighter jets mobilised too, if I saw a 20 foot dragon I think one of the first things I'd think of was "I forsee a new King Kong, with a dragon and slightly better airplanes instead. And no annoying woman."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:45 am
Just thought I'd say that common sense isn't all that common anymore. And yes, I love vampires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:02 am
I love to research this type of stuff. It's actually been my conviction that there exists the possibility of True Vampires. As faint as the possibility is, there still remains one. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't let anything get wiped off the charts simply due to the slim probability, even if it's 1% there is still a possibility. I'm also fascinated by the myth of immortality, which has its connection to this issue. There are many things true vampires may be, but really I suppose I'm looking for those beings who would be termed immortals. Slim probability of existance, but one cannot deny or prove anything that thus far has no real evidence. Along with that, I do not deny faerie kidnappings, ghosts, and whatever else you might throw at me. I merely take things with a lot of salt (a bag to be precise) in that I acknowledge the probability, but do not readily believe in it as absolute.
Added Note: Vampires are one of my favorites. whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
