|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:26 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:37 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
scorplett Aino Ailill scorplett Aino Ailill scorplett Heck, it doesn't even apply to me unless I'm performing one of two different rituals! Could you elaborate on this? My understanding (which, granted, is primarily from fiction sources like Charmed x.x) of the Law of Three is that it is constant. As in, that it is always happening for every action. Should they be 'good,' then good is returned plus some. Should it be 'bad,' then bad is returned plus some. The threefold rule/law, at least in actual Wicca, is nothing more than a ritual contrivance. That is not to mean it is not important however, it is incredibly important! In some instances it has been removed from all context and therefore has lost it's intended meaning and function, or perhaps it would be more correct to say, it's intended outcome or result. There are two rituals within Wicca which make reference or use of the threefold rule. One is direct, and is part of one of the initiation rituals. The other is a ritual drama which is required to understand the mystery that the initiation arouses. The threefold law is an action within ritual. It is an orthopraxic action, placed in a specific ritual context in order to bring about a specific result. The concept of the threefold law having something to do with a law of return is something that I believe has been a elaborated and decontextualized construction of eclectic neopagan witchcraft. It may be the case that some initiates have contemplated a law of return as a result of the threefold rule, however it is not taught as a fundamental principal of ethics of Wicca. It can cause an ethical inner dialogue for the initiate as they process their experiences, that's up to the individual. As a result of the threefold rule, many Wiccans will develop a concept of return, consequence or similar. However, it is not return by three, the three part is only relevant to ritual. Thank you so much! Your welcome! I take it that means I made some sense then? At least enough to be understood on some level?
Indeed. Or, at least, I believe so. I'll summarize and you can tell me if I'm off base, if you would:
The Threefold Law is something that is not intended to multiply the 'good' or 'bad,' or just energy in general, by three but rather an action that is utilized within two specific rituals in order to help bring understanding in one and, in the other, has another purpose (which I am not certain of). Erm, within the Wiccan trad. And individuals might add onto the meaning for themselves.
Assuming I'm correct:
I don't understand why it is 'three fold,' though. Is the action repeated three times?
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:32 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
scorplett Aino Ailill I don't understand why it is 'three fold,' though. Is the action repeated three times? Yes, it is an action done once. And then in return, the same action is returned three fold. I guess from that people might be able to figure out from open source what I might be pointing to. I read the open source but basing off of my personal experience, one's actions affects the person causing the action physically, mentally(since this is what I consider to be emotional), and spiritually.
Edit: Clarity
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:55 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
rmcdra scorplett Aino Ailill I don't understand why it is 'three fold,' though. Is the action repeated three times? Yes, it is an action done once. And then in return, the same action is returned three fold. I guess from that people might be able to figure out from open source what I might be pointing to. I read the open source but basing off of my personal experience, one's actions affects the person causing the action physically, mentally(since this is what I consider to be emotional), and spiritually. Edit: Clarity
yes, that is true. These things do effect an individual on numerous levels. And I suppose on one level of consideration, this could indeed be considered threefold return, however it does not nescessarily follow that such an effect is true outside of such contexts. The interesting thing with the rite in question, is that it is not only the active performance that creates such a reaction. If it is understood that with such role reversal the reciever of the three already understands it's nature, that nature is evoked within them as the active participant begins to reluctantly follow through in providing three times the number. The emotional/mental reaction is far greater than that of the physical action. The spiritual reaction and subsequent understanding is reliant on the orthopraxic effect happening.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:58 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
scorplett rmcdra scorplett Aino Ailill I don't understand why it is 'three fold,' though. Is the action repeated three times? Yes, it is an action done once. And then in return, the same action is returned three fold. I guess from that people might be able to figure out from open source what I might be pointing to. I read the open source but basing off of my personal experience, one's actions affects the person causing the action physically, mentally(since this is what I consider to be emotional), and spiritually. Edit: Clarity yes, that is true. These things do effect an individual on numerous levels. And I suppose on one level of consideration, this could indeed be considered threefold return, however it does not nescessarily follow that such an effect is true outside of such contexts. The interesting thing with the rite in question, is that it is not only the active performance that creates such a reaction. If it is understood that with such role reversal the reciever of the three already understands it's nature, that nature is evoked within them as the active participant begins to reluctantly follow through in providing three times the number. The emotional/mental reaction is far greater than that of the physical action. The spiritual reaction and subsequent understanding is reliant on the orthopraxic effect happening. Oops! I forgot the "not" part. "I haven't read" was what I meant. I was purely going off of experience here. I didn't mean to imply differently. Also I was interpreting it within my belief system, rather than any particular system. Forgive my presumptuousness there.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|