|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:50 am
|
|
|
|
Ok, first of all, don't get me wrong. I don't have any personal issues with freegans. That is, unless they go around trying to be vegetarians when they're not. Freeganism is a completely different way of eating and living.
A freegan is still an omnivore. They're just an "aware" omnivore. Same with Pescetarians....still consuming flesh. I don't really like the terms to be linked with vegans/vegetarians, because it's hypocritical "Oh you know, I'm a vegetarian/vegan...except sometimes when I eat animals". It gives a bad image to true vegans/veggies, because omni's see the contradictions just as much as I do, and in the long run true vegans/vegetarians will be thought of as lazy and hypocritical because of these select individuals.
I don't mind it if they mention that they're ALMOST vegan/vegetarian, or are converting to vegan/vegetarianism, or if they say "I consume mostly a plant based diet, but I also consume flesh of (blank) variety", that's ok too, but to be like "Hey, I'm too lazy to actually be a vegan/vegetarian, but I still want to be in the same grouping as them!", does not settle well with me.
They should be grouped somewhere else otherwise, but that's just my feelings.
Um...wow. Didn't realize I had such pent up feelings about the given topic.
And if I make anyone upset, sorry that wasn't me intention. Just ranting what my feelings are about the given topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:10 pm
|
|
|
|
Lucifer Over London emo godfather You could also say that vegeterian is a bullshit term made up by people who are trying to justify eating honey, eggs, dairy, yet still associate themselves with vegans. heart I don't disagree with that, but the term vegetarian did come around long before the term vegan did. Pescetarian is a stupid, ridiculous concept. By using it, you're practically saying that fish are not animals. Even worse are the morons who call themselves "pollotarians"
Not trying to get in a debate with you, but just wanted to say that even though the word vegetarian came long before the word vegan, the original meaning of the word vegetarian was actually no animals or animal bi-products what-so-ever, but then it got switched over to just no animals. So, originally, vegetarian was actually supposed to be what we now call vegan.
Actually, the International Vegetarian Union still uses the original definition of the word vegetarian, basically meaning no animals or their bi-products.
So, emo godfather is technically right saying that vegetarians are just trying to associate themselves with vegans. I mean, if you go with the historical definition of the word.
Info: http://www.ivu.org/faq/definitions.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|