|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 2:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:20 pm
 |
|
|
|
Shadow - Dragon Vigilia Sorry for the wait for your other question. Yes, you can get a fossil pokemon in fossil form, since resurrecting a fossil results in the level 5 fossil pokemon anyways. So, it's pretty much the same deal as asking for a pokemon to be an egg as claimed. You'll just have to get it resurrected. Yes, simon could interact with a giratina if you wanted, but it could not be catching and cannot count towards any legendary encounter achievement (i think simon already has that legitly anyways tho, so no prob there) just know that there isn't just one of each legendary in this guild, so... yeah. Not that i think that would matter to you much. Thank you for the answers though, Completely understand about the encounter not counting towards anything. I might not have Simon actually see Giratina, instead just talk to a projection that the Pokemon will use
okay. :3
lol, should have it's projection being like "... Why are there humans here... "
you don't have to but I'd personally be amused. |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:46 pm
|
|
|
 |
Vigilia Shadow - Dragon Vigilia Sorry for the wait for your other question. Yes, you can get a fossil pokemon in fossil form, since resurrecting a fossil results in the level 5 fossil pokemon anyways. So, it's pretty much the same deal as asking for a pokemon to be an egg as claimed. You'll just have to get it resurrected. Yes, simon could interact with a giratina if you wanted, but it could not be catching and cannot count towards any legendary encounter achievement (i think simon already has that legitly anyways tho, so no prob there) just know that there isn't just one of each legendary in this guild, so... yeah. Not that i think that would matter to you much. Thank you for the answers though, Completely understand about the encounter not counting towards anything. I might not have Simon actually see Giratina, instead just talk to a projection that the Pokemon will use okay. :3 lol, should have it's projection being like "... Why are there humans here... " you don't have to but I'd personally be amused.
Of course, lol, that's why I'll some times push against the forth wall in my posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:29 pm
|
|
|
|
So, I know it's been a while, so it's a bit on the late side, but I wanted to make a comment on the gem balls. Personally, I like them. I like that they work similar to the apricorns, and I like that they are better on pokemon of the types associated with the gems they're made from. It's a nice idea, and it definitely adds a bit more flavor to the kinds of pokeballs available.
I'm just not sure they're worth the effort.
Again, I like them, but from a numbers standpoint... It's not a good deal. Twenty posts to get a gem, not counting the posts to get to a craftsman, and each gem makes two balls. Not so bad. Except that each gem ball works as a great ball for their chosen type, and plain great balls cost ten posts each. So, assuming you're able to cash in the gem for the balls immediately after acquiring it, that means you either get two balls that work like great balls on a single type... Or just cut out the typing trouble and get two great balls. Unless you already happened to have a stockpile of gems you thought you'd use but ended up not needing, or you're getting your gems through the occasional horoscope, it's just... Not efficient.
Anyway, didn't mean to rain on people's parade. I do like the idea and all, I just thought I'd give my two cents on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:23 pm
|
|
|
|
Lia Syuki So, I know it's been a while, so it's a bit on the late side, but I wanted to make a comment on the gem balls. Personally, I like them. I like that they work similar to the apricorns, and I like that they are better on pokemon of the types associated with the gems they're made from. It's a nice idea, and it definitely adds a bit more flavor to the kinds of pokeballs available. I'm just not sure they're worth the effort. Again, I like them, but from a numbers standpoint... It's not a good deal. Twenty posts to get a gem, not counting the posts to get to a craftsman, and each gem makes two balls. Not so bad. Except that each gem ball works as a great ball for their chosen type, and plain great balls cost ten posts each. So, assuming you're able to cash in the gem for the balls immediately after acquiring it, that means you either get two balls that work like great balls on a single type... Or just cut out the typing trouble and get two great balls. Unless you already happened to have a stockpile of gems you thought you'd use but ended up not needing, or you're getting your gems through the occasional horoscope, it's just... Not efficient. Anyway, didn't mean to rain on people's parade. I do like the idea and all, I just thought I'd give my two cents on it.
Thank you for you feedback! Even late, it's still much appreciated. I think we discussed having them be Ultra and then there was some miscommunication and it didn't up getting changed, so thank you for pointing that out. Their effectiveness will be changed to ultra in just a moment. I'm glad you like the new pokeballs~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
