|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 5:33 pm
|
|
|
|
Galad Damodred Priestley Galad Damodred Priestley Xandris zz1000zz Since nothing says abortions are a sin, we must assume they are not. There weren't exactly a whole lot of them going on in Biblical days either. The more children the better. Where was the opportunity for this to even come up? The Bible isn't a medical journal. The Bible accounts only for miscarriage with regard to the law, so it's not like the concept of stillbirth was foreign to the Jews.
As for abortion, though, I highly doubt medical science was advanced enough to know the intricacies of the womb and childbirth, let alone able to fully examine the ethics behind such a procedure. Since the Bible says nothing, God's will is open to speculation.How does it go? " Justice is my Father's prerogative. The rest of us can only do what we think is right." I wouldn't know what 'it' was.Michael Demiurgos to the archangel Gabriel in Mike Carey's Lucifer comic series. Now I understand. Still, one can't expect everyone else to recognise obscure references. wink Regardless, what does it have to do with the discussion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:42 am
|
|
|
|
Priestley Galad Damodred Priestley Galad Damodred Priestley The Bible isn't a medical journal. The Bible accounts only for miscarriage with regard to the law, so it's not like the concept of stillbirth was foreign to the Jews.
As for abortion, though, I highly doubt medical science was advanced enough to know the intricacies of the womb and childbirth, let alone able to fully examine the ethics behind such a procedure. Since the Bible says nothing, God's will is open to speculation. How does it go? " Justice is my Father's prerogative. The rest of us can only do what we think is right." I wouldn't know what 'it' was.Michael Demiurgos to the archangel Gabriel in Mike Carey's Lucifer comic series. Now I understand. Still, one can't expect everyone else to recognise obscure references. wink Regardless, what does it have to do with the discussion? We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-functioning Businesswoman
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:59 pm
|
|
|
|
Galad Damodred zz1000zz Galad Damodred We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives. God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times.
But we believe it all to be entirely God inspired. God dictated it, man wrote it down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:58 pm
|
|
|
|
Galad Damodred zz1000zz Galad Damodred We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives. God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times.
This in no way changes anything. God is quite capable of ensuring his message got to humans. It is most rational to assume his word is accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-functioning Businesswoman
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:56 pm
|
|
|
|
zz1000zz Galad Damodred zz1000zz Galad Damodred We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives. God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times. This in no way changes anything. God is quite capable of ensuring his message got to humans. It is most rational to assume his word is accurate.
Exactly. To assume otherwise is insulting to God. confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:27 pm
|
|
|
|
Curse-of-the-Phoenix one: God did not write the bible his diciples did so there is bound to be some flaw AKA there was no abortion back then and they knew nothing of it. There are records of abortions in primitive and pre-industrial societies (Wikipedia: Abortion [History of Abortion]). It is reasonable to assume that Bible writers did not include it in the Bible because the writers had little to no knowledge of this medical practice themselves or did not find it pertinent.
Curse-of-the-Phoenix Two: abortion is like your grandmother knitting a sweater for someone you dont know if you were to walk in grab the sweater and tear it to shreds you had destroyed something that would make someone happy but instead you made your grandmother mad. What is the significance of it being made for someone else and me not knowing?
A sweater is an object external to and independent of the body. I would not tear up the sweater unless said grandmother did not wish to keep it. Get a better simile.
Curse-of-the-Phoenix Three: Human or not they have to become human at some point and correct me if im wrong (my bible is missing) but isnt there a verse that says he knew us when we were in the womb that meens we were human in the womb. No it does not mean that.
For example, if I were to draw designs for a boat, I would know that product before I had begun to make it, while I was making it and after I finished making it. Said product is not human. Therefore, knowing something does not necessarily make that thing human.
Curse-of-the-Phoenix i hope this got my point through I don't know what your point was, but I'm assuming it was along the lines of "God does not permit abortion".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:44 pm
|
|
|
|
Fushigi na Butterfly zz1000zz Galad Damodred zz1000zz Galad Damodred We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives. God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times. This in no way changes anything. God is quite capable of ensuring his message got to humans. It is most rational to assume his word is accurate. Exactly. To assume otherwise is insulting to God. confused Oh, is it? Then let us say that I have insulted the God of the Covenant and leave it at that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:59 am
|
|
|
|
zz1000zz Galad Damodred zz1000zz Galad Damodred We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives. God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times. This in no way changes anything. God is quite capable of ensuring his message got to humans. It is most rational to assume his word is accurate. It is also rational to assume that man made mistakes writing it so that what was intended by God for man is not actually what we see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:17 am
|
|
|
|
Priestley zz1000zz Galad Damodred zz1000zz Galad Damodred We cannot expect our moral judgments to have any degree of certainty. Only God, all-powerful, all-knowing, eternal and perfect can do that. We can only put forward our own limited, flawed, human perspectives. God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times. This in no way changes anything. God is quite capable of ensuring his message got to humans. It is most rational to assume his word is accurate. It is also rational to assume that man made mistakes writing it so that what was intended by God for man is not actually what we see.
I agree man could possibly have made mistakes in the process. However, I can find no reason to believe God would punish people for following what he has given them to the best of their abilities.
One can argue the Bible is inaccurate. However, that argument does not allow for anything new. As such, there is little value in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:08 am
|
|
|
|
zz1000zz Priestley zz1000zz Galad Damodred zz1000zz God has provided his word so humans know his moral judgments. The Bible did not arrive by fax from Heaven. Man made it as a record of tumultuous times. This in no way changes anything. God is quite capable of ensuring his message got to humans. It is most rational to assume his word is accurate. It is also rational to assume that man made mistakes writing it so that what was intended by God for man is not actually what we see.I agree man could possibly have made mistakes in the process. However, I can find no reason to believe God would punish people for following what he has given them to the best of their abilities. I never claimed He would.
zz1000zz One can argue the Bible is inaccurate. However, that argument does not allow for anything new. As such, there is little value in it. Doubt is new in this discussion. The argument for the possibility of errors in the text contrasts the view that the Bible is wholly accurate, adding to the Galad Damodred's claim that the Bible is not a facsimile (that is, an exact copy) of God's word sent from Heaven.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|