|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm
this thread is dedicated to the discussion of which is better Guns N' Roses or Motley Crue and why.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:04 pm
i say Guns N' Roses... because they sound alot better to me then Motley Crue ever did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:53 am
And I say Motley Crue. I think that they have better songs and no whiney-a** lead singers who drop off the face of the earth for years at a time only to resurface and still suck. Dats just me though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:18 pm
gotta go with guns and roses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:10 pm
Guns and Roses. Though Axl Rose may be an a**, he was probably one of the best frontmen in the world when he was in his prime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
