|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:01 pm
|
|
|
|
I suck at making topics, but hey, here's a try. Something I've always been curious about and figure the awesome crowd here might have some good opinions. My question is, in its simple form, "what about magical language makes it magical?"
I don't of course expect any one answer, heh. But what I'm curious about is various beliefs about what a spoken or written language must be to be magical. If a language is considered magical when written, does that also apply to being spoken? What if you do not write in the magical language, but write its words in a phonetic approximation? Does that undo the magical element?
Also, does the intent/writer/speaker have anything to do with it? If a fluff finds something cool and decides to start scrawling all her luv spells in it, is it dangerous? Or, conversely, what if it is written with no magical intent at all, say by someone who is studying the language for anthropological reasons?
Am I splitting hairs too finely? *puts on student hat*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:04 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:31 am
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai In my humble, moderate, pensive, subtle opinion... Three things. The Glyphs The Voice The Psychodrama Within a mythos- one can "catch" or understand something by it's True Voice. If you listen (and know what you are looking for) you can "hear" someone's true voice in their daily speech. The Glyphs are pretty simple. When looking at the mysteries within each letter- (or cipher there of), resonance is established. Psychodrama as Nuri said- the language makes you think about something that would otherwise be second nature to the point where the importance of what your are saying might have been glossed over.
Exactly what she said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:18 am
|
|
|
|
Well, I'll tackle this from three slightly different perspectives.
Psychodrama has already been well covered and needs no further explanation.
The Second is when the incantation, or words have been specifically tied to an effect by an externall intellegence. The words themselves don't possesses power save by ancient agreement, or the personal attention it draws from other entities which have tied a value to it. Such that, a specific phrase does not, itself, inact effect, but rather garners the attention of an external creature which then does so. The language may be considered mystical if it is the common, or agreeded upon language between a group and an external patron, but only in so much as the sway it has with said patron. The unaware do this only at their own risk.
The Third is the case where the actual phrase has power. It is the formulae to an equation that produces an effect. Anyone who can propperly utter it can pull it off. Of course, such situations require exacting attention to detail to be reliable... Or alot of luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:32 pm
|
|
|
|
[Bavi] Fiddlers Green The Third is the case where the actual phrase has power. It is the formulae to an equation that produces an effect. Anyone who can propperly utter it can pull it off. Of course, such situations require exacting attention to detail to be reliable... Or alot of luck. Just so I'm sure that I understand... The correct pronunciation of YHVH is an example?
I haven't run into any source actually defining the true pronunciation of YHWH. At least, my studies always give me to understand that it's unpronouncable. Particularly since it has the nickname of the "unpronouncable tetragrammaton". It's sacred and not meant to be used frequently or lightly. It's the earthly name of God, representing the greatest understanding of Him any normal human being can have. It should be, therefore, a physically impossible sound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|