|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:14 pm
|
|
|
|
I was considering making this topic in M&R, but I thought that I would start the topic here, so I can get some support for debate, along with feedback. Anyway, here we go:
Lets just assume for a second that (hypotheticly) it has been proven that YHVH is not the only God out there, and that his laws only apply to those bound in covenent to him.
In the same way, the laws of someone bound to another God (or multiple Gods for that matter) only apply to those bound to the other God(s).
What happens to someone who is baptized as an infant (thereby becoming a child of YHVH), gets confirmed, but then realizes it is not the path they were supposed to be on, and swear themselves to (an)other God(s). Who's laws apply? YHVH's because he was the first to be bound to the person? Or the other God(s), because the person believes in them completely?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:02 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:51 pm
|
|
|
|
PhantomPhoenix0 Anyway, Tea. I was confirmed in the 8th grade (so about 14), but I didnt really have a choice in the matter. My parents just said that I had confirmation classes, and within 10 minutes I was sitting there at church. magpie, I was confirmed Lutheran, so bishops and excommunication dont really exist to my knowledge (at least in the Lutheran sense). Bahaha, same thing happened to me. I was also baptized Lutheran (Missouri Synod) and, reluctantly, went through confirmation. I'd say the best thing I got out of it was a girlfriend, although even that didn't turn out so great.
I think the Lutheran method of baptizing babies was meant to be a statement by the parents, i.e., the parents are declaring before the pastor and congretation their intention to raise their child in the Lutheran way. Infants only know comfort and discomfort, not the complexities involving a covenant with a deity. If, from that point, the parents decide never to involve their child with the church or Lutheran way, then nothing has changed for the child, and it just proves that baby baptism is really meaningless.
Confirmation requires a fair bit of memorization and some thinking. While still too naive in the mid-teens, I was able to understand the basics of what was taught, between the lord's prayer, the two creeds, the ten commandments and holy communion. I didn't fully understand the reasoning for bizarre concepts involved, such as "eating" Jesus on a bi-weekly basis, portions of the lord's prayer (I still am bashful when "thine kingdom come" is said) and why we need to believe in an Apostolic church when we were a Lutheran church. But I was too thick-headed and was constantly being advised by my family not to question anything or I was sinning.
Children are highly impressionable, and if you manipulate something into a child's head well enough, it sticks with them for life, no matter how much they do not want it. Does such a way of learning constitute a covenant? I don't think so, unless you stretch predestination around it, but then that gives rise to reasoning that proselytization is an extension of predestination, and then things get nasty. However, though this logic suggests a covenant requiring a choice, can years of family and church influence simply be forgotten? That, I think, has no general answer, and instead depends upon the ability of the individual to make that thorough a switch. Therefore, the third factor that has to be taken into account with making a switch is influence through upbringing. Much as you may not want to admit, your values are based on the values of the people you grew up around, even if yours are based around opposing theirs. The question might be adjusted to "can you break from your upbringing?"
Another thought might be, you were born into the U.S. (or wherever), and although it was not your choice, you are bound to follow the laws of the country so long as you remain there. If you leave the country at an adult age, you will forever have the influence of your birth country's values, and you will forever compare the values of other countries to that.
Forgive the use of "you," but I am in a time crunch and had to cut corners in order to get this out before I have to head to class. K bye! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:09 pm
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai PhantomPhoenix0 Anyway, Tea. I was confirmed in the 8th grade (so about 14), but I didnt really have a choice in the matter. My parents just said that I had confirmation classes, and within 10 minutes I was sitting there at church. Somehow I missed this. An oath taken against free will or without understanding isn't one that I consider one must keep- especially if there is no ability to understand it to begin with.
...I wish I could be that succinct. redface
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:50 am
|
|
|
|
Sevendreams TeaDidikai PhantomPhoenix0 Anyway, Tea. I was confirmed in the 8th grade (so about 14), but I didnt really have a choice in the matter. My parents just said that I had confirmation classes, and within 10 minutes I was sitting there at church. Somehow I missed this. An oath taken against free will or without understanding isn't one that I consider one must keep- especially if there is no ability to understand it to begin with. ...I wish I could be that succinct. redface
Heh. It takes practice. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|