|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:56 pm
|
|
|
|
Personally, I prefer modern fantasy at the moment. I started out with medieval-type fantasy books, like Tamora Pierce, but got bored of those. Recently, the only medieval fantasy books I've read, not re-read, was the Song of Fire and Ice series. Other than that, I read pretty much specifically modern fantasy. I have no idea why, but it appeals to me.
So, here's my question to you: Which do you like better, modern or medieval fantasy books?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 11:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:48 pm
|
|
|
|
I like Victorian-era fantasy, or Turn-of-the-Century and alternate history stuff, really. I guess you could call it "gaslight fantasy."
But I think modern catches my fancy of the two choices offered. I used to really like Charles deLint type stuff, where the fantastic strongly contrasted with the everyday.
I like timeslips and "fish out of earth" stories a lot, though, because they make a nicer bridge from my standpoint in modernity to a secondary world.
(It's a rare term, which my not have seen much circulation, but Fish Out of Earth stories are those tales where someone from the modern world, or a modern world, A World Very Much like Our Own, in fact, gets transported to a wholly fantastic Secondary World, like middle earth or Agharta. They're easiest to get into.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 9:16 pm
|
|
|
|
Harbone Yay! Another fellow Gaslight Raticionator! I should also point out that Howl's Moving Castle, at least as portrayed in the movie, is very "gaslight" (or steampunk, as it's sometimes labelled.)
Ok, I really, really, really need to see the movie now!
The book isn't, particularly.
And if you haven't read Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell you certainly should, Harbone. And don't skip the footnotes!
I'm also very fond of Sorcery and Cecelia, but since it's also got ties to the Regency romance type of book, I am less certain that you'd like it.
Other than that--I'm with what others have said--if it is good I like it, whenever it is set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|