|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Holy hell it’s a dragon deck!
Monsters 19
3x Red-eye’s Darkness Metal Dragon
2x Genesis Dragon
2x Horous Dragon lv 6
2x Horous Dragon lv 8
2x Debris Dragon
1x Dandylion
3x blues white dragon
3x white stone of legend
1x Prime Material Dragon
Spells 16
1x Future fusion
2x Dragons mirror
3x CARDS OF CONSONANCE
2x Trade ins
1x Dark Hole
1x foolish burial
1x mind control
1x Burial from a different Dimension
1x Pot of avarice
1x Monster Reborn
2x Mystical Space Typhoon
Traps 5
3x Royal Decree
1x Call of the haunted
1x Torrential Tribute
Extra Deck
2x Star dust dragon
1x shooting star dragon (right xD)
2x Formula synchron ( oddly enough this is possible)
2x Black Rose Dragon
2x Ancient fairy dragon
2x mist wurm
1x blues ultimate dragon
3x Five headed dragon
(anything else?)
Side Deck
1x Mirror force
2x Nobleman of Crossout
2x Nobleman of Extermination
2x Bottomless trap hole
2x cyber dragon
1x royal oppression
1x Giant trunade
2x Malevolent Catastrophe
1x pot of avarice
1x Return from the different dimension
Well here's another deck I thought of. Comment, question, tear it apart. I love constructive criticism so what should stay or go. This deck is ment to prove a point on my campus...that I know what Im doing.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:26 pm
might i suggest maybe sideboarding Delta Attack if you can get all three Blue-Eyes or Five-Headed Dragons on the field?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:54 pm
greenman007 might i suggest maybe sideboarding Delta Attack if you can get all three Blue-Eyes or Five-Headed Dragons on the field? five headed dragon has an effect, so delta attacker wont work with it. delta attacker is overall a bad card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:56 pm
axean greenman007 might i suggest maybe sideboarding Delta Attack if you can get all three Blue-Eyes or Five-Headed Dragons on the field? five headed dragon has an effect, so delta attacker wont work with it. delta attacker is overall a bad card. ^This. This isn't a real competitive deck, it's to prove a shitty point. I still want to play it...if anyone knows how to make this deck insanely competitive I would love that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:04 pm
if you want a competitive decklist, wait for someone who's played a dragon deck before. i really don't know how to make a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:08 pm
axean if you want a competitive decklist, wait for someone who's played a dragon deck before. i really don't know how to make a good one. Noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
