|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:09 pm
|
Violet Song jat Shariff Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Recursive Paradox Asahi Sara Recursive Paradox Pet names always seem to be liked more when they're personal in nature. Using something mythological, religious or related to cultures you don't have a direct part in seems too impersonal to really achieve that, wouldn't you agree? I feel the same way about it personally Me and my partner refer to each other as "love" relatively often. Sort of a shortening of "my love". I call everyone "love." Or "lovely." Or "lovie." Or "sunshine," "dearie," "dearheart," or "beautiful." Or various pastries. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:28 pm
|
|
|
|
Calixti Recursive Paradox Asahi Sara Recursive Paradox Pet names always seem to be liked more when they're personal in nature. Using something mythological, religious or related to cultures you don't have a direct part in seems too impersonal to really achieve that, wouldn't you agree? I feel the same way about it personally Me and my partner refer to each other as "love" relatively often. Sort of a shortening of "my love". I call everyone "love." Or "lovely." Or "lovie." Or "sunshine," "dearie," "dearheart," or "beautiful." Or various pastries. sweatdrop
I don't. I'm usually like, "hey you! *grin*"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Recursive Paradox Calixti Recursive Paradox Asahi Sara Recursive Paradox Pet names always seem to be liked more when they're personal in nature. Using something mythological, religious or related to cultures you don't have a direct part in seems too impersonal to really achieve that, wouldn't you agree? I feel the same way about it personally Me and my partner refer to each other as "love" relatively often. Sort of a shortening of "my love". I call everyone "love." Or "lovely." Or "lovie." Or "sunshine," "dearie," "dearheart," or "beautiful." Or various pastries. sweatdrop I don't. I'm usually like, "hey you! *grin*"
My girlfriend calls me her pixie and I call her my wolfie. If that isn't annoyingly cutesy enough, those terms of endearment have already devolved into frillier pet names. razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Calixti Recursive Paradox Asahi Sara Recursive Paradox Pet names always seem to be liked more when they're personal in nature. Using something mythological, religious or related to cultures you don't have a direct part in seems too impersonal to really achieve that, wouldn't you agree? I feel the same way about it personally Me and my partner refer to each other as "love" relatively often. Sort of a shortening of "my love". I call everyone "love." Or "lovely." Or "lovie." Or "sunshine," "dearie," "dearheart," or "beautiful." Or various pastries. sweatdrop I just call everyone "hon." The few that are really close to me I call "babe."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violet Song jat Shariff Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:51 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|