|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:27 am
If you have any questions, please ask it here.
Also, tell us what you think of this trading feature and tell us your suggestions if you have any.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:20 am
I think that tamers should be able to trade any of their digimon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:23 am
very true....*agrees with Epic* you could always just put at the bottom right hand corner: "Digimon perviously owned by..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:35 am
The Deadly Shadow very true....*agrees with Epic* you could always just put at the bottom right hand corner: "Digimon perviously owned by..." well what about their former art. Their digimon in their former art can still be used in battling. What's the use of trading then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:56 am
Grandwing The Deadly Shadow very true....*agrees with Epic* you could always just put at the bottom right hand corner: "Digimon perviously owned by..." well what about their former art. Their digimon in their former art can still be used in battling. What's the use of trading then? only undigivolved digimon can be traded 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:05 pm
Grandwing The Deadly Shadow very true....*agrees with Epic* you could always just put at the bottom right hand corner: "Digimon perviously owned by..." well what about their former art. Their digimon in their former art can still be used in battling. What's the use of trading then? well, actually, the users would have to update their tamer profile, and remove all past art of the digmon they traded. They would not be able to use the new digimon's past forms, because they didn't get them. If a mod saw these rules being broken, an official warning would be issued, and the tamer would be banned from ever fighting in the digi coliseum ever again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:12 pm
Epic_Muffin Grandwing The Deadly Shadow very true....*agrees with Epic* you could always just put at the bottom right hand corner: "Digimon perviously owned by..." well what about their former art. Their digimon in their former art can still be used in battling. What's the use of trading then? well, actually, the users would have to update their tamer profile, and remove all past art of the digmon they traded. They would not be able to use the new digimon's past forms, because they didn't get them. If a mod saw these rules being broken, an official warning would be issued, and the tamer would be banned from ever fighting in the digi coliseum ever again. well what if all members in tamer island trade digimon at the same time, they could even spam digimon trading. Wouldn't it be hard and confusing for the artmakers? *Its not that easy deleting former art. They could still save it in their computer and after a couple of months which we all have forgotten, *poof* their digimon is back. We cannot monitor all members in Tamer Island.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:13 pm
Grandwing Epic_Muffin Grandwing The Deadly Shadow very true....*agrees with Epic* you could always just put at the bottom right hand corner: "Digimon perviously owned by..." well what about their former art. Their digimon in their former art can still be used in battling. What's the use of trading then? well, actually, the users would have to update their tamer profile, and remove all past art of the digmon they traded. They would not be able to use the new digimon's past forms, because they didn't get them. If a mod saw these rules being broken, an official warning would be issued, and the tamer would be banned from ever fighting in the digi coliseum ever again. well what if all members in tamer island trade digimon at the same time. Wouldn't it be hard and confusing for the artmakers? add a limit of five trades at a time, any others will have to wait for the next preceeding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:56 pm
This isn the best idea yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:28 am
cycozombie4 This isn the best idea yet. Yeah I dis-like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:23 pm
I dont really like the idea of trading digimons..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:34 pm
well I have an idea and I posted it in the chatterbox :3 I think my idea might work for this sub-forum :3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:44 pm
Maybe we are missing a BIG factor here. I read somewhere that traded digimon couldn't be traded anymore, so we (artists) HAVE to know if it's traded or not, so.
Why not a traded digimon background?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:11 pm
that's awesome!! xD well anyway, I still think we should have a list in this forum of all the traded digimon and the tamers so than we know they aren't cheating xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
