|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:32 pm
|
|
|
|
patch99329 *cheers*I was hoping a thread about animism would pop up. I didn't have enough to make a topic myself. Patch- you should PM me with this kind of stuff. I'm always up for working on this kind of thing.
Quote: I am not an animist, because it dosen't quite add up in my head. If even inanimate objects have a spirit, what about things that were living but are now dead? Does a corpse still have awareness? My personal experience says "Yes" actually.
I usually break spirits of corporeal things into two groups. Awakened and not.
Just because something has an aware spirit does not mean that the spirit is always orientated to external stimuli.
A hair plucked from my head is essentially dead. But the proteins that make up my hair can be awakened.
Within my beliefs sympathetic magic doesn't rely on the idea that the hair is part of me, but on the idea that the spirits awakened (or forced while they are in an unconscious state) connect to me by means of the knowledge of who I am and their memory of me. (This knowledge could be likened to true names, or true voices etc)
Quote: And what if an inanimate object is made from a multitude of things, some of which were alive once? Do all these compnents merge into one? Again- a whole and the spirit there of is more than the sum of it's parts. If we look as this as a puzzle, each piece of the puzzle can be identified as an individual. However- the puzzle itself can be identified as an individual as well. It depends on which is awake or not.
Dragon_Witch_Woman While I belive all living things have a spirit (including plants), I don't belive non-living things have a spirit. So, no, I'm not an animist. Is there a reason you draw the line between "alive" and not alive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:03 am
|
|
|
|
As a practitioner of Seithcraft in the Scandinavian tradition, I am definitely a believer in Animism. One of the major tenets of the Norse shamanic path is the belief in Landvaettir, the Spirits of the Land. Landvaettir range from the spirits of prominent terrain features such as hills or forests to entire plains or river valleys, although certain objects such as curiously shaped boulders and particularly large or old trees can also have spirits. Waterfalls, lakes, rivers, and other bodies of water were inhabited by spirits, and Norse and Teutonic mythology is rich with tales of Elves, Trolls, Dwarves, and other supernatural creatures who lived in the earth, wood, or water. There are also stories of swords and other inanimate objects inhabited by spirits, although in most cases such objects were either very old and of legendary quality or were awakened by ritual magic. Inanimate objects could also be awakened through the use of Galdhr, or rune magic in which the wizard forges a name of power and inscribes it upon the object, thereby making the object into a spirit entity with its own name and identity. It should be noted that in rune magic, such an item was given a purpose and upon reaching the end of its usefulness was broken so that the spirit could be free to continue on its path; many magicians believed that if the spirit remained bound for too long, it would turn against those who created it. Those who remember the tale of The Sorcerer's Apprentice should keep this lesson in mind!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:35 pm
|
|
|
|
patch99329 However, I do believe something like a lake or mountain could have spirits. These spirits may happen to inhabit the place or be associated with it, but the spirit is INDEPENDANT to the rock itself. Does that make sense? The rock dosen't have awareness for example, but the spirits that inhabit it do. Perfect sense. However- I would assert that said spirit is as much of the rock as our spirit is of ourselves.
Quote: Ohh, something just clicked in my mind. Do you believe that everything is aware by default? Or 'hibernating' as it were, and in need of 'awakening'? Some spirits are awake and some are not. Most (as in 99.99999999%) inanimate objects and more than a fair few plants are not awake when I first encounter them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:42 pm
|
|
|
|
TatteredAngel My relationship to said spirits around me hasn't gone much farther than a general sense of acknowledgement. It's something I intend to explore more. Interesting Tattered. How do you intend to explore it?
godhi There are also stories of swords and other inanimate objects inhabited by spirits, although in most cases such objects were either very old and of legendary quality or were awakened by ritual magic. Interesting- so would you assert that inanimate objects do posses spirits that are not awakened unto themselves unless they are "very old"?
Do you have any examples of such rituals outside of Galdhr?
Quote: Inanimate objects could also be awakened through the use of Galdhr, or rune magic in which the wizard forges a name of power and inscribes it upon the object, thereby making the object into a spirit entity with its own name and identity. It should be noted that in rune magic, such an item was given a purpose and upon reaching the end of its usefulness was broken so that the spirit could be free to continue on its path; many magicians believed that if the spirit remained bound for too long, it would turn against those who created it. Would it be fair to say that such a spirit formed was not of the object itself?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|