|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:20 am
|
|
|
|
rmcdra TeaDidikai rmcdra Please help. Is it true that Christmas is a misappropriation of Sol Inviticus to convert the pagans? I don't believe it is but I can't find any information on this subject. Other way around actually. Christmas as an observation of Yeshua's incarnation predated the Mid-Winter celebration of Sol Invictus. Is there sources for this? I'm getting bombarded about how Christianity is a stolen pagan holiday and NewAdvent.org is actually failing me here. Update: The oldest documentation of Sol Inviticus is 354 CE where as the oldest documentation of Christmas being on the 25th is 243 CE. What's that oldest documentation? I thought they were both in the chronography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 2:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:19 pm
|
|
|
|
Celeblin Galadeneryn rmcdra TeaDidikai rmcdra Please help. Is it true that Christmas is a misappropriation of Sol Inviticus to convert the pagans? I don't believe it is but I can't find any information on this subject. Other way around actually. Christmas as an observation of Yeshua's incarnation predated the Mid-Winter celebration of Sol Invictus. Is there sources for this? I'm getting bombarded about how Christianity is a stolen pagan holiday and NewAdvent.org is actually failing me here. Update: The oldest documentation of Sol Inviticus is 354 CE where as the oldest documentation of Christmas being on the 25th is 243 CE. What's that oldest documentation? I thought they were both in the chronography. I'm sorry I was mistaken about Sol Inviticus it was created in 274 CE. My source for the dating of Christmas on Dec 25 as early as 243 CE is here Calculating Christmas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:08 pm
|
|
|
|
rmcdra Celeblin Galadeneryn rmcdra TeaDidikai rmcdra Please help. Is it true that Christmas is a misappropriation of Sol Inviticus to convert the pagans? I don't believe it is but I can't find any information on this subject. Other way around actually. Christmas as an observation of Yeshua's incarnation predated the Mid-Winter celebration of Sol Invictus. Is there sources for this? I'm getting bombarded about how Christianity is a stolen pagan holiday and NewAdvent.org is actually failing me here. Update: The oldest documentation of Sol Inviticus is 354 CE where as the oldest documentation of Christmas being on the 25th is 243 CE. What's that oldest documentation? I thought they were both in the chronography. I'm sorry I was mistaken about Sol Inviticus it was created in 274 CE. My source for the dating of Christmas on Dec 25 as early as 243 CE is here Calculating Christmas. The date 243 isn't mentioned in that article. Moreover, it's generally accepted that Aurelian didn't create Dies Natalis Sol Invictus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Celeblin Galadeneryn rmcdra Celeblin Galadeneryn rmcdra TeaDidikai rmcdra Please help. Is it true that Christmas is a misappropriation of Sol Inviticus to convert the pagans? I don't believe it is but I can't find any information on this subject. Other way around actually. Christmas as an observation of Yeshua's incarnation predated the Mid-Winter celebration of Sol Invictus. Is there sources for this? I'm getting bombarded about how Christianity is a stolen pagan holiday and NewAdvent.org is actually failing me here. Update: The oldest documentation of Sol Inviticus is 354 CE where as the oldest documentation of Christmas being on the 25th is 243 CE. What's that oldest documentation? I thought they were both in the chronography. I'm sorry I was mistaken about Sol Inviticus it was created in 274 CE. My source for the dating of Christmas on Dec 25 as early as 243 CE is here Calculating Christmas. The date 243 isn't mentioned in that article. Moreover, it's generally accepted that Aurelian didn't create Dies Natalis Sol Invictus. Ugh then is there better sources you can recommend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
rmcdra Celeblin Galadeneryn rmcdra Celeblin Galadeneryn rmcdra Is there sources for this? I'm getting bombarded about how Christianity is a stolen pagan holiday and NewAdvent.org is actually failing me here. Update: The oldest documentation of Sol Inviticus is 354 CE where as the oldest documentation of Christmas being on the 25th is 243 CE. What's that oldest documentation? I thought they were both in the chronography. I'm sorry I was mistaken about Sol Inviticus it was created in 274 CE. My source for the dating of Christmas on Dec 25 as early as 243 CE is here Calculating Christmas. The date 243 isn't mentioned in that article. Moreover, it's generally accepted that Aurelian didn't create Dies Natalis Sol Invictus. Ugh then is there better sources you can recommend. Unfortunately not much in the way of online ones.
I should clarify the Aurelian thing. Aurelian is the one said to have started it by ancient sources. Kind of like how ancient sources say Rome wasn't inhabited before 753 BC. And they're really the only source we have on that being the right date. And as far as Rome goes, we have archaeological evidence that certain hills were inhabited as far back as 1000 BC. As for DNSI, we have no evidence besides an author or two to say that Aurelian originated the festival.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|