|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:48 am
|
|
|
|
Recursive Paradox (a rather bigoted arrangement in and of itself, no?) Because visiting bigotry against the sum of a group in retaliation for the bigotry of a portion thereof is of course the rational and ethical thing to do. rolleyes
Quote: To be entirely clear (in case of misunderstanding) I'm criticizing the tradition and its harmful effects on a certain disenfranchised group of people. I am not calling married individuals or the culture that made the current incarnation of marriage what it is asinine. So you're making a generalization about the tradition and suggesting the tradition, and not the bigots to support specific kinds of the tradition, are responsible for misconduct?
Quote: I never said the sum total. Why do you have the impression that I meant the sum total? Might have something to do with the fact you never specified, merely derided the whole thing. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 9:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 10:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 10:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 11:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 12:12 pm
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai Recursive Paradox (a rather bigoted arrangement in and of itself, no?) Because visiting bigotry against the sum of a group in retaliation for the bigotry of a portion thereof is of course the rational and ethical thing to do. rolleyes
Remarkable how you continue to fail to explain how I have actually shown bigotry and continue to operate under said unexplained assumption. Truly remarkable.
Quote: Quote: To be entirely clear (in case of misunderstanding) I'm criticizing the tradition and its harmful effects on a certain disenfranchised group of people. I am not calling married individuals or the culture that made the current incarnation of marriage what it is asinine. So you're making a generalization about the tradition and suggesting the tradition, and not the bigots to support specific kinds of the tradition, are responsible for misconduct?
If you can show me that marriage as a tradition (in it's current incarnation) carries either a multitiered definition that is applicable on a wide social basis (allowing there to be legitimization of poly individuals and meaning that the delegitimization of poly folks is entirely the fault of equivocation on the part of bigots, like in the case of gay marriage) then I will gladly concede the point and happily see this in a far more positive light.
Or alternately if you can show me that the definition itself does not force a social application of one individual + one individual in the social contract that marriage creates with no opening for adjustment and that the bigots have been twisting or even lying about the meaning to achieve their own ends then I will, as pointed out above, gladly concede the point and see marriage in its current incarnation much more positively.
But until then the claim that the it is merely the bigots and not the widespread entirely mainstream application of the tradition itself is a little bit unjustified.
Quote: Quote: I never said the sum total. Why do you have the impression that I meant the sum total? Might have something to do with the fact you never specified, merely derided the whole thing. stare
You're going to have to explain how there was an implication of the entire history of marriage being derided. I can understand if a lack of clarity (which I certainly apologize for) on my part would prompt you to ask what I mean, but assuming I mean the most offensive thing possible to you? Not a terribly good way to handle the situation.
TeaDidikai Let's do it this way: Recursive Paradox Marriage Christianity Wica Gender Reassignment is an asinine tradition and really does entangle a lot of really stupid social undercurrents with what should be a simple legal contract between romantic partners divinity and it's followers a person and their body.
Because poorly constructed analogies built from a lack of understanding of what your opponent has said and between items possessing no similarities at all within the context of your opponent's argument are such a great counterargument. *rolls eyes*
Appeal to emotion fallacy has been noted too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:42 pm
|
|
|
|
SpaceTerminal Destiny maenad nuri Also, I think one of the instructors at my dance studio is going to be on So You Think You Can Dance will be on the next show. He was in the Top 40 last year, and there's been video cameras about. Ironically, I'll miss most of it because I'll be at class. I don't think he made it though ...he has classes all summer long going on and is even starting a new one. I have a friend who just made it through the first round of So You Think You Can Dance Canada. Except I don't think that disclosing to your friends the fact you have on FB is appropriate when you're a mild cosplay celebrity and thus have 2100 friends on Facebook as a result. rofl
I know this guy was allowed to say that he did very well. But that's where it ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 10:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 2:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 2:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 10:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 3:21 pm
|
Violet Song jat Shariff Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 11:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|