|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:51 am
|
|
|
|
Teague the Druid Obviously, you realize I didn't mean to imply that humans were worshipped like gods. I should have specified. I didn't think you did, my point was to show how they are treated very differently.
Quote: I don't see any evidence for a rule against referring to gods in "human" terms. Apollo was called a Kourros, a unbearded youth, which refers to his gender, his age, and is no less restrained to the domain of humanity than "man" or "woman" or "boy" or "girl" are- but it was an essential part of his image or depiction. You're taking labels that do work with gods and humans (youth, bearded) and equating them with ones that do not (man, woman, boy, girl). And are continuously repeating that, despite those labels being distinctly human.
Quote: In any case, I should know better than to argue about the exact meaning of a word. In some languages, being a woman is the same as being a wife or "potential wife". In others, it's simply a word for human or person- paired with some indicator of gender. Then again, "person" and "being" or "sentient being" seem to become synonymous sometimes. When this started, I was also thinking in regards to the use of "man" and "woman" to denote age, which can be important to a deity's nature. That was probably because of what was mentioned earlier concerning Artemis. When a being is ageless, denoting age seems... silly. You can describe Artemis in terms that indicate a general age: her being a virgin, or a maiden, or what have you. But man and woman are too general. A male human is a man at 20 just as he is a man at 80. Yet a man at 20 and a man at 80 are at very different stages of their lives, and so I think the label would not work, if it weren't a label for male human beings in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:28 am
|
|
|
|
Tagra Nar When a being is ageless, denoting age seems... silly. You can describe Artemis in terms that indicate a general age: her being a virgin, or a maiden, or what have you. But man and woman are too general. A male human is a man at 20 just as he is a man at 80. Yet a man at 20 and a man at 80 are at very different stages of their lives, and so I think the label would not work, if it weren't a label for male human beings in the first place.
You listed "youth" as a word that could be applied to both mortals and gods. You were correct in that- the relative "youth" or "age" of a deity can go a long way to define them, as does whatever animal or creature they take the form of, though for some reason no one argues that a snake-god cannot be called a snake-god.
Quote: You're taking labels that do work with gods and humans (youth, bearded) and equating them with ones that do not (man, woman, boy, girl). And are continuously repeating that, despite those labels being distinctly human.
Actually, boy or young man is sort of implied in "Kourros". I can see you have a mental block against this, and that you'll accept any words to define a deity other than man or woman, even if they carry the same connotations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:16 pm
|
|
|
|
Teague the Druid Actually, boy or young man is sort of implied in "Kourros". I can see you have a mental block against this, and that you'll accept any words to define a deity other than man or woman, even if they carry the same connotations. I would think a young god, or a god in the image of a young man, is more implied there than him being a boy or young man himself. I really don't like people commenting on what my mental landscape consists of, especially ones that I do not know personally. While "man" or "boy," or "girl" or "woman" may be implied in the epithets of the Gods, labeling them as man or woman is improper. This is not a mental block. This is knowing the application of a term used to denote a male human and female human respectively, and that applying said denotations to gods either doesn't make sense or is improper. God and Goddess seem to be applicable labels when making note of what gender, say, Apollo and Athena are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|